--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/networksecurity/ipsec/te_ipsec/scripts/ns-ipsec-multiple-sa-ops.script Tue Jan 26 15:23:49 2010 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,1030 @@
+//
+// Copyright (c) 2009 Nokia Corporation and/or its subsidiary(-ies).
+// All rights reserved.
+// This component and the accompanying materials are made available
+// under the terms of "Eclipse Public License v1.0"
+// which accompanies this distribution, and is available
+// at the URL "http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html".
+//
+// Initial Contributors:
+// Nokia Corporation - initial contribution.
+//
+// Contributors:
+//
+// Description:
+//
+/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+//! @file
+//! @SYMScriptAuthor divakare
+//! @SYMTestSuiteName ns-ipsec-multiple-sa
+//! @SYMScriptCreationDate Fri Nov 14 16:04:14 IST 2008
+/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+PRINT Run test case(s) for suite ns-ipsec-multiple-sa
+
+// ToDo: Remember to load the relevant suite before starting any test case(s)
+LOAD_SUITE t_ipsec -SharedData
+RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\testdata\configs\ethernetced1853.xml c:\ethernetced1853.xml
+RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\ethernetced1853.xml
+RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\ethernetced1853.xml
+//Create private folder
+RUN_UTILS MkDir c:\private\101f7993\
+
+//copy linux_tunnel.pin file from data folder to private folder - one time job
+RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\testdata\configs\linux_tunnel.pin c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pin
+RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pin
+
+//copy epoc2linux.xml file from data folder to c: drive - one time job
+RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\testdata\configs\epoc2linux.xml c:\epoc2linux.xml
+RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-001
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-001
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//! Single IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! Remote host supports the first proposal mentioned.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The most preferred IKE SA proposal is stated in the beginning.
+//!
+//! The first IKE SA proposal should be negotiated between the peers. This is because the remote host supports the first proposal.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal. This is the IPSec SA proposal negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestActions The most prefered proposal is always placed in the beginning.
+//!
+//! There are multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The remote host is configured to support the first IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Main mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+//! @SYMREQ REQ10660
+//! REQ10661
+//! REQ10967
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel13.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-001
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-002
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-002
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//! Single IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! The IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! Remote host does not support the first proposal mentioned.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The most preferred IKE SA proposal is stated in the beginning.
+//!
+//! The next preferred proposal in the list is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal. This is the IPSec SA proposal negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The remote host is configured such that it does not support the first IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Main Mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+//! @SYMREQ REQ10660
+//! REQ10661
+//! REQ10967
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel14.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-002
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-003
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-003
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//! Single IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! This test case is to test if the IKE SA negotiation works for a different combination of algorithms provided.
+//!
+//! The last IKE SA proposal is the only one supported by the remote host.
+//!
+//! The last IKE SA proposal in the list is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! The IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The most preferred IKE SA proposal is stated in the beginning.
+//!
+//! The last IKE SA proposal should be negotiated between the peers. This is because the remote host supports the first proposal.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal. This is the IPSec SA proposal negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The remote host is configured to support the last IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Aggressive mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+//! @SYMREQ REQ10660
+//! REQ10661
+//! REQ10967
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel15.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-003
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-004
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-004
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposals. Sompe invalid proposals present. (First proposal is invalid : May be with a wrong Syntax).
+//! Single IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! The IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! The invalid proposal is ignored and the next preferred proposal in the list is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The first invalid proposal is ignored and a valid SA proposal negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Main mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! The first invalid proposal is ignored and a valid SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+//! @SYMREQ REQ10660
+//! REQ10661
+//! REQ10967
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel16.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-004
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-005
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-005
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposals. Sompe invalid proposals present. (Invalid proposal in the middle : May be with a wrong Syntax)
+//! Single IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! The remote machine is configured such that it supports the first IKE SA proposal in the list.
+//!
+//! The IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! The first IKE SA proposal is negotiated between the peers ignoring the invalid proposal.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The preferred valid proposal in the list of proposals is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Main mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! The preferred valid proposal in the list of proposals is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+//! @SYMREQ REQ10660
+//! REQ10661
+//! REQ10967
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel17.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-005
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-006
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-006
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposals. Sompe invalid proposals present. (Invalid proposal in the end).
+//! Single IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! The IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The preferred valid proposals in the list is negotiated.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Main mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! The preferred valid proposal in the list of proposals is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+//! @SYMREQ REQ10660
+//! REQ10661
+//! REQ10967
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel18.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND !Error=-5197 MultipleSATestWrapperSection NegativeTestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-006
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-007
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-007
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Single IKE SA proposals.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! Remote host supports the first proposal mentioned.
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! The first valid IPSec SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The most prefered proposal is always placed in the beginning.
+//!
+//! The first IPSec SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IPSec SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The remote host is configured to support the first IPsec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Main mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+//! @SYMREQ REQ10660
+//! REQ10661
+//! REQ10967
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel19.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND !Error=-5197 MultipleSATestWrapperSection NegativeTestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-007
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-008
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-008
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Single IKE SA proposals.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! Remote host does not support the first proposal mentioned.
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! The next preferred proposal in the list is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The first valid IPSec SA proposal specified in the list is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! Here the remote host does not support the first IPSec SA in the list. Hence the next valid IPSec SA is negotiated.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The remote host is configured such that it does not support the first IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation may be carried out using 2 combinations of modes. They are,
+//! 1.) Main mode and Quick mode
+//! 2.)Aggressive mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+//! @SYMREQ REQ10660
+//! REQ10661
+//! REQ10967
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel20.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND !Error=-5197 MultipleSATestWrapperSection NegativeTestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-008
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-009
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-009
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Single IKE SA proposals.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! This test case is to test if the IPsec SA negotiation works for a different combination of algorithms provided.
+//!
+//! The last IPSec SA proposal is the only one supported by the remote host.
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! The last IPSec SA proposal in the list is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The first IPSec SA proposal should be negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! The remote host should support the first IPSec SA.
+//! @SYMTestActions A valid SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! There are multiple IPSec SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Aggressive mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! The preferred valid proposal in the list of proposals is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+//! @SYMREQ REQ10660
+//! REQ10661
+//! REQ10967
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel21.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND !Error=-5197 MultipleSATestWrapperSection NegativeTestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-009
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-010
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-010
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Single IKE SA proposal.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposal. Sompe invalid proposals present. (First proposal is invalid : May be with a wrong Syntax).
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! The invalid proposal is ignored and the next preferred proposal in the list is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The valid SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IPSec SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Main mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! The first invalid proposal is ignored and a valid SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+//! @SYMREQ REQ10660
+//! REQ10661
+//! REQ10967
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel22.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-010
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-011
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-011
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Single IKE SA proposal.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposal. Sompe invalid proposals present. (Proposals in the middle are invalid)
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! The remote host is configured to support only the last IPSec SA proposal in the list.
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! The invalid proposal is ignored and the last preferred proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The valid SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IPSec SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Main mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! The invalid proposal is ignored and a valid SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel23.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-011
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-012
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-012
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Single IKE SA proposal.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposal. Sompe invalid proposals present. (Proposals in the end are invalid)
+//!
+//! The negotiation is carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The valid SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestActions The valid SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel24.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-012
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-013
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-013
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the right error code returned for the following.
+//!
+//! Valid IKE SA proposals.
+//! All IPSec SA proposals are invalid.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults An error is returned, as none of the IPSec SA proposals are valid.
+//! @SYMTestActions An error returned.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel25.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-013
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-014
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-014
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the right error code returned for the following.
+//!
+//! All IKE SA proposals are invalid.
+//! Valid IPSec SA proposals.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults An error is returned, as none of the IKE SA proposals are valid.
+//! @SYMTestActions An error is returned.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel26.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-014
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-015
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-015
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Single IKE SA proposal present for a remote machine with which the Epoc communicates.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposals present. These proposals have different remote machine addresses.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! (Refer IOT test specification. Test case name: windows_tc_113)
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The right IPSec SA proposal present for the remote machine with which the Epoc communicates is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! The single IKE SA present is negotiated between the peers.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel27.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-015
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-016
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-016
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposal present. These proposals have different remote machine addresses.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposals present. These proposals have different remote machine addresses.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! (Refer IOT test specification. Test case name: windows_tc_113)
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The most preferred SA proposal with which the Epoc communicates is negotiated between the peers.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel28.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-016
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-017
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-017
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposal present. These proposals have different remote machine addresses.
+//! Single IPSec SA proposals present. This proposal has a remote machine addresses with which the Epoc communicates with.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! The IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! (Refer IOT test specification. Test case name: windows_tc_113)
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The right IKE SA proposal with which the Epoc communicates is negotiated between the peers.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel29.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-017
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-018
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-018
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposal present. These proposals are for the same remote machine.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposals present. These proposals are for the same remote machine.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults A most preferred IPSec SA and IKE SA negotaited between the peers.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel30.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND !Error=-5197 MultipleSATestWrapperSection NegativeTestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-018
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-019
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-019
+//! @SYMCreationDate 19-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposal present. These proposals have different remote machine addresses.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposals present. These proposals have different remote machine addresses.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults A most preferred IPSec, IKE SA is negotiated between the peers.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel31.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND !Error=-5197 MultipleSATestWrapperSection NegativeTestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-019
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-020
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-020
+//! @SYMCreationDate 25-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposal present. These proposals are for the same remote machine.
+//! Single IPSec SA proposals present. This proposal is for the remote machine with which the Epoc communicates.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Aggressive mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! The IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! Remote host supports the first proposal mentioned.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The most preferred IPSec/IKE SA is negotiated between the peers.
+//!
+//! Here as the remote machine is configured to support thefirst IKE/IPSec SA proposal, this is negotiated between the peers.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IKE SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IPSec SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The remote host is configured to support the first IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation may be carried out using,
+//! 1.)Aggressive mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel32.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND !Error=-5197 MultipleSATestWrapperSection NegativeTestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-020
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-021
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-021
+//! @SYMCreationDate 25-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Single IKE SA proposal present. This proposal is for the remote machine with which the Epoc communicates.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposals present. These proposals are for the same remote machine.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Aggressive mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//!
+//! Remote host supports the first proposal mentioned.
+//! @SYMTestActions There are multiple IPsec SA proposals.
+//!
+//! There is only one IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The remote host is configured to support the first IKE SA proposal.
+//!
+//! The negotiation may be carried out using,
+//! 1.)Aggressive mode and Quick mode
+//!
+//! Once the SA proposals are negotiated between the peers both for IKE and IPSec, this SA is compared with the expected result.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel33.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND !Error=-5197 MultipleSATestWrapperSection NegativeTestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-021
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-022
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-022
+//! @SYMCreationDate 25-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposal present. These proposals are for the same remote machine.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposals present. These proposals are for the same remote machine.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Aggressive mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - ESP
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol ESP.
+//! @SYMTestExpectedResults The most preferred SA proposal is negotiated between the peers.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel34.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-022
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-023
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-023
+//! @SYMCreationDate 26-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Multiple IKE SA proposal present. These proposals are for the same remote machine.
+//! Single IPSec SA proposals present. This proposal is for the remote machine with which the Epoc communicates.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - AH
+//!
+//! The IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol AH.
+//!
+//! Remote host supports the first proposal mentioned.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel35.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-023
+
+START_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-024
+//! @SYMTestCaseID NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-024
+//! @SYMCreationDate 26-09-2008
+//! @SYMAuthor DivakarE
+//! @SYMTestCaseDesc Test to check if the multiple SA proposal functionality works for the following.
+//!
+//! Single IKE SA proposal present. This proposal is for the remote machine with which the Epoc communicates.
+//! Multiple IPSec SA proposals present. These proposals are for the same remote machine.
+//!
+//! The negotiation carried out using,
+//! Phase 1 :Main mode
+//! Phase 2 :Quick mode
+//!
+//! Phase 2 Encapsulation Mode - Tunnel Mode
+//! Security Protocol - AH
+//!
+//! All the IPSec SA proposals in the policy file are for the security protocol AH.
+//!
+//! Remote host supports the first proposal mentioned.
+ RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS CopyFile z:\TestData\configs\linux_tunnel36.pol c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+ RUN_UTILS MakeReadWrite c:\private\101f7993\linux_tunnel.pol
+
+ //run batch file to ping the linux machine. Pol file is change, so need ceding again.
+ RUN_PROGRAM -1 ced c:\epoc2linux.xml
+
+ START_TEST_BLOCK 100 t_ipsec z:\testdata\scripts\ns-ipsec-multiplesatest-ops.ini
+ CREATE_OBJECT IPSecMultipleSATestWrapper MultipleSATestWrapperSection
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection New
+ COMMAND MultipleSATestWrapperSection TestMultipleSA MultipleSAParamSection
+ END_TEST_BLOCK
+END_TESTCASE NET-IPSec-Multiple_SA_Proposal-024
+
+RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\epoc2linux.xml
+RUN_UTILS DeleteFile c:\ethernetced1853.xml
+