diff -r bb2423252ea3 -r c1029e558ef5 networksecurity/ipsec/ipsecpol/src/ipsecpolmanconflict.cpp --- a/networksecurity/ipsec/ipsecpol/src/ipsecpolmanconflict.cpp Wed Sep 15 13:53:10 2010 +0300 +++ b/networksecurity/ipsec/ipsecpol/src/ipsecpolmanconflict.cpp Wed Oct 13 16:17:27 2010 +0300 @@ -106,8 +106,6 @@ TBool CIPSecPolicyManagerHandler::CalculateCombinedPolicyBypassDropMode() { - LOG(Log::Printf(_L("CalculateCombinedPolicyBypassDropMode\n"))); - // Combined mode is 'bypass_everything_else' by default TInt combinedMode(KInboundBypass | KOutboundBypass); @@ -149,7 +147,6 @@ // the combined policy into IPsec protocol component TBool changed = (iBypassOrDropMode != combinedMode); iBypassOrDropMode = combinedMode; - LOG(Log::Printf(_L("combined policy mode %d\n"), iBypassOrDropMode)); return(changed); } @@ -330,13 +327,6 @@ { continue; } - //UMA support REQ 417-40027 - //loading bypass policy with activated drop_mode policy. Above mentioned is only one way traffic. - if ((iIPSecGANSupported) && (iFunction & KAddDhcpBypassSelectors) - && (remotePort == 68 || localPort == 67)) - { - continue; - } // Iterate to next selector if IKE bypass is requested and selector // contains ports utilized with IKE @@ -567,20 +557,7 @@ aPolicySelector->iRemoteMask.Address(), ps->iRemote.Address(), ps->iRemoteMask.Address()); - //UMA support - TBool flag_exception = EFalse; - if( iIPSecGANSupported ) - { - flag_exception = CheckException(); - LOG(Log::Printf(_L("::CompareSelectorsL, exception policy is = %d\n"), flag_exception)); - //Not performing overlapping because UMA loads with any to any selector. Now if any to any will result in - //overlapping as 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 will encrypt every packet, which dont leads exceptions and overlapping as concern - if(flag_exception ||iCurrentException ) - { - continue; - } - } - + if (overlappingOccurs) { err = ESelectorConflict;