diff -r ae94777fff8f -r 59758314f811 Symbian3/PDK/Source/GUID-D3F52BB9-7230-499C-9BB7-CFAEDBA8F48B.dita
--- a/Symbian3/PDK/Source/GUID-D3F52BB9-7230-499C-9BB7-CFAEDBA8F48B.dita Fri Jun 11 12:39:03 2010 +0100
+++ b/Symbian3/PDK/Source/GUID-D3F52BB9-7230-499C-9BB7-CFAEDBA8F48B.dita Fri Jun 11 15:24:34 2010 +0100
@@ -1,43 +1,43 @@
-
-
-
-
-
- Usually control areas (and hence feedback areas) should not overlap. However,
-in some cases you may have to define a priority for the feedback areas. Consider, for example, situations where a compound control has a simple
-control inside its own area as illustrated in the figure below. In both situations, the compound control wants to give one type of feedback,
-but there should be a different type of feedback (or no feedback at all) for
-the simple control. Both controls can register themselves to area registry,
-but the problem is making sure that simple control has a higher priority than
-the compound control (in the API implementation hit tests are only run as
-long as one control with matching area and pointer event type is found). You can solve this in two ways:
-
In many cases the first option is most natural choice, but you can also -use the second option in case the situation changes after the areas have been -already added to the area registry.
-The priority order will only remain as long as the next area is added -to the registry, that is, moving some area to first priority will only keep -it as the top priority area as long as the next area is added to the registry. -(Registry entries of one window are kept in a stack, and new areas are always -added on top.)
Usually control areas (and hence feedback areas) should not overlap. However, +in some cases you may have to define a priority for the feedback areas.
+Consider, for example, situations where a compound control has a simple +control inside its own area as illustrated in the figure below.
+In both situations, the compound control wants to give one type of feedback, +but there should be a different type of feedback (or no feedback at all) for +the simple control. Both controls can register themselves to area registry, +but the problem is making sure that simple control has a higher priority than +the compound control (in the API implementation hit tests are only run as +long as one control with matching area and pointer event type is found).
+You can solve this in two ways:
In many cases the first option is most natural choice, but you can also +use the second option in case the situation changes after the areas have been +already added to the area registry.
+The priority order will only remain as long as the next area is added +to the registry, that is, moving some area to first priority will only keep +it as the top priority area as long as the next area is added to the registry. +(Registry entries of one window are kept in a stack, and new areas are always +added on top.)