fix for cdt bug 263987 (slightly different from our proposal but just as effective)
--- a/cdt/cdt_6_0_x/org.eclipse.cdt.core/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/errorparsers/GCCErrorParser.java Tue Sep 15 10:25:52 2009 -0500
+++ b/cdt/cdt_6_0_x/org.eclipse.cdt.core/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/errorparsers/GCCErrorParser.java Mon Sep 21 09:18:33 2009 -0500
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
new ErrorPattern(Messages.GCCErrorParser_skip_note),
new ErrorPattern(Messages.GCCErrorParser_sikp_instantiatedFromHere),
// The following are not...
- new ErrorPattern(Messages.GCCErrorParser_Warnings, 1, 2, 6, 0, 0) {
+ new ErrorPattern(Messages.GCCErrorParser_Warnings, 1, 2, 5, 0, 0) {
@Override
public String getVarName(Matcher matcher) {
String desc = getDesc(matcher);
--- a/cdt/cdt_6_0_x/org.eclipse.cdt.core/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/errorparsers/messages.properties Tue Sep 15 10:25:52 2009 -0500
+++ b/cdt/cdt_6_0_x/org.eclipse.cdt.core/src/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/errorparsers/messages.properties Mon Sep 21 09:18:33 2009 -0500
@@ -16,7 +16,8 @@
GCCErrorParser_skip_forEachFunction=for each function it appears in.\\)
GCCErrorParser_skip_note=: note:
GCCErrorParser_sikp_instantiatedFromHere=instantiated from
-GCCErrorParser_Warnings=(.*?):([0-9]+):([0-9]+:)?( (.*[Ww]arning:|WARNING:|[Ee]rror:))? (.*)
+#GCCErrorParser_Warnings=(.*?):([0-9]+):([0-9]+:)?( (.*[Ww]arning:|WARNING:|[Ee]rror:))? (.*)
+GCCErrorParser_Warnings=(.*?):([0-9]+):([0-9]+:)?(.*?[([Ww]arning)(WARNING)([Ee]rror)]:)? (.*)
GLDErrorParser_error_text=(.*)\\(\\.text\\+.*\\): (.*)
GLDErrorParser_warning_general=ld(\\.exe)?: [Ww]arning:? (.*)
GLDErrorParser_error_general=ld(\\.exe)?: (.*)