MCL/sf/adapt/qemu: comparison symbian-qemu-0.9.1-12/python-2.6.1/Lib/test/test

equal deleted inserted replaced

-:ffa851df0825
+:2fb8b9db1c86
+"""Test script for unittest.
+By Collin Winter <collinw at gmail.com>
+Still need testing:
+TestCase.{assert,fail}* methods (some are tested implicitly)
+"""
+from test import test_support
+import unittest
+from unittest import TestCase
+import types
+### Support code
+################################################################
+class LoggingResult(unittest.TestResult):
+def __init__(self, log):
+self._events = log
+super(LoggingResult, self).__init__()
+def startTest(self, test):
+self._events.append('startTest')
+super(LoggingResult, self).startTest(test)
+def stopTest(self, test):
+self._events.append('stopTest')
+super(LoggingResult, self).stopTest(test)
+def addFailure(self, *args):
+self._events.append('addFailure')
+super(LoggingResult, self).addFailure(*args)
+def addError(self, *args):
+self._events.append('addError')
+super(LoggingResult, self).addError(*args)
+class TestEquality(object):
+# Check for a valid __eq__ implementation
+def test_eq(self):
+for obj_1, obj_2 in self.eq_pairs:
+self.assertEqual(obj_1, obj_2)
+self.assertEqual(obj_2, obj_1)
+# Check for a valid __ne__ implementation
+def test_ne(self):
+for obj_1, obj_2 in self.ne_pairs:
+self.failIfEqual(obj_1, obj_2)
+self.failIfEqual(obj_2, obj_1)
+class TestHashing(object):
+# Check for a valid __hash__ implementation
+def test_hash(self):
+for obj_1, obj_2 in self.eq_pairs:
+try:
+assert hash(obj_1) == hash(obj_2)
+except KeyboardInterrupt:
+raise
+except AssertionError:
+self.fail("%s and %s do not hash equal" % (obj_1, obj_2))
+except Exception, e:
+self.fail("Problem hashing %s and %s: %s" % (obj_1, obj_2, e))
+for obj_1, obj_2 in self.ne_pairs:
+try:
+assert hash(obj_1) != hash(obj_2)
+except KeyboardInterrupt:
+raise
+except AssertionError:
+self.fail("%s and %s hash equal, but shouldn't" % (obj_1, obj_2))
+except Exception, e:
+self.fail("Problem hashing %s and %s: %s" % (obj_1, obj_2, e))
+################################################################
+### /Support code
+class Test_TestLoader(TestCase):
+### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromTestCase
+################################################################
+# "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived
+# class testCaseClass"
+def test_loadTestsFromTestCase(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foo_bar(self): pass
+tests = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests)
+# "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived
+# class testCaseClass"
+#
+# Make sure it does the right thing even if no tests were found
+def test_loadTestsFromTestCase__no_matches(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def foo_bar(self): pass
+empty_suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), empty_suite)
+# "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived
+# class testCaseClass"
+#
+# What happens if loadTestsFromTestCase() is given an object
+# that isn't a subclass of TestCase? Specifically, what happens
+# if testCaseClass is a subclass of TestSuite?
+#
+# This is checked for specifically in the code, so we better add a
+# test for it.
+def test_loadTestsFromTestCase__TestSuite_subclass(self):
+class NotATestCase(unittest.TestSuite):
+pass
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(NotATestCase)
+except TypeError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail('Should raise TypeError')
+# "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived
+# class testCaseClass"
+#
+# Make sure loadTestsFromTestCase() picks up the default test method
+# name (as specified by TestCase), even though the method name does
+# not match the default TestLoader.testMethodPrefix string
+def test_loadTestsFromTestCase__default_method_name(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self):
+pass
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+# This has to be false for the test to succeed
+self.failIf('runTest'.startswith(loader.testMethodPrefix))
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [Foo('runTest')])
+################################################################
+### /Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromTestCase
+### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromModule
+################################################################
+# "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase"
+def test_loadTestsFromModule__TestCase_subclass(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+expected = [loader.suiteClass([MyTestCase('test')])]
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), expected)
+# "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase"
+#
+# What happens if no tests are found (no TestCase instances)?
+def test_loadTestsFromModule__no_TestCase_instances(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [])
+# "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase"
+#
+# What happens if no tests are found (TestCases instances, but no tests)?
+def test_loadTestsFromModule__no_TestCase_tests(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+pass
+m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [loader.suiteClass()])
+# "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase"s
+#
+# What happens if loadTestsFromModule() is given something other
+# than a module?
+#
+# XXX Currently, it succeeds anyway. This flexibility
+# should either be documented or loadTestsFromModule() should
+# raise a TypeError
+#
+# XXX Certain people are using this behaviour. We'll add a test for it
+def test_loadTestsFromModule__not_a_module(self):
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+class NotAModule(object):
+test_2 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(NotAModule)
+reference = [unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])]
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), reference)
+################################################################
+### /Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromModule()
+### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromName()
+################################################################
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# Is ValueError raised in response to an empty name?
+def test_loadTestsFromName__empty_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromName('')
+except ValueError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "Empty module name")
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ValueError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# What happens when the name contains invalid characters?
+def test_loadTestsFromName__malformed_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+# XXX Should this raise ValueError or ImportError?
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromName('abc () //')
+except ValueError:
+pass
+except ImportError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ValueError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to a
+# module"
+#
+# What happens when a module by that name can't be found?
+def test_loadTestsFromName__unknown_module_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromName('sdasfasfasdf')
+except ImportError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "No module named sdasfasfasdf")
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ImportError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# What happens when the module is found, but the attribute can't?
+def test_loadTestsFromName__unknown_attr_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromName('unittest.sdasfasfasdf')
+except AttributeError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'")
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# What happens when we provide the module, but the attribute can't be
+# found?
+def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_unknown_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromName('sdasfasfasdf', unittest)
+except AttributeError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'")
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+# ...
+# "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+#
+# Does loadTestsFromName raise ValueError when passed an empty
+# name relative to a provided module?
+#
+# XXX Should probably raise a ValueError instead of an AttributeError
+def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_empty_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromName('', unittest)
+except AttributeError, e:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("Failed to raise AttributeError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+# ...
+# "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+#
+# What happens when an impossible name is given, relative to the provided
+# `module`?
+def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_malformed_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+# XXX Should this raise AttributeError or ValueError?
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromName('abc () //', unittest)
+except ValueError:
+pass
+except AttributeError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ValueError")
+# "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+#
+# Does loadTestsFromName raise TypeError when the `module` argument
+# isn't a module object?
+#
+# XXX Accepts the not-a-module object, ignorning the object's type
+# This should raise an exception or the method name should be changed
+#
+# XXX Some people are relying on this, so keep it for now
+def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_not_a_module(self):
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+class NotAModule(object):
+test_2 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('test_2', NotAModule)
+reference = [MyTestCase('test')]
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), reference)
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# Does it raise an exception if the name resolves to an invalid
+# object?
+def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_bad_object(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+m.testcase_1 = object()
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1', m)
+except TypeError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("Should have raised TypeError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may
+# resolve either to ... a test case class"
+def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_TestCase_subclass(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1', m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_TestSuite(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+m.testsuite = unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testsuite', m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+# ... a test method within a test case class"
+def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_testmethod(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1.test', m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# Does loadTestsFromName() raise the proper exception when trying to
+# resolve "a test method within a test case class" that doesn't exist
+# for the given name (relative to a provided module)?
+def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_invalid_testmethod(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1.testfoo', m)
+except AttributeError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "type object 'MyTestCase' has no attribute 'testfoo'")
+else:
+self.fail("Failed to raise AttributeError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+# ... a callable object which returns a ... TestSuite instance"
+def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__TestSuite(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+testcase_2 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+def return_TestSuite():
+return unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1, testcase_2])
+m.return_TestSuite = return_TestSuite
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('return_TestSuite', m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [testcase_1, testcase_2])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+# ... a callable object which returns a TestCase ... instance"
+def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__TestCase_instance(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+def return_TestCase():
+return testcase_1
+m.return_TestCase = return_TestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('return_TestCase', m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [testcase_1])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+# ... a callable object which returns a TestCase or TestSuite instance"
+#
+# What happens if the callable returns something else?
+def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__wrong_type(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+def return_wrong():
+return 6
+m.return_wrong = return_wrong
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('return_wrong', m)
+except TypeError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise TypeError")
+# "The specifier can refer to modules and packages which have not been
+# imported; they will be imported as a side-effect"
+def test_loadTestsFromName__module_not_loaded(self):
+# We're going to try to load this module as a side-effect, so it
+# better not be loaded before we try.
+#
+# Why pick audioop? Google shows it isn't used very often, so there's
+# a good chance that it won't be imported when this test is run
+module_name = 'audioop'
+import sys
+if module_name in sys.modules:
+del sys.modules[module_name]
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromName(module_name)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [])
+# audioop should now be loaded, thanks to loadTestsFromName()
+self.failUnless(module_name in sys.modules)
+finally:
+if module_name in sys.modules:
+del sys.modules[module_name]
+################################################################
+### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromName()
+### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames()
+################################################################
+# "Similar to loadTestsFromName(), but takes a sequence of names rather
+# than a single name."
+#
+# What happens if that sequence of names is empty?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__empty_name_list(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames([])
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [])
+# "Similar to loadTestsFromName(), but takes a sequence of names rather
+# than a single name."
+# ...
+# "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+#
+# What happens if that sequence of names is empty?
+#
+# XXX Should this raise a ValueError or just return an empty TestSuite?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_empty_name_list(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames([], unittest)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# Is ValueError raised in response to an empty name?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__empty_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromNames([''])
+except ValueError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "Empty module name")
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ValueError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# What happens when presented with an impossible module name?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__malformed_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+# XXX Should this raise ValueError or ImportError?
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromNames(['abc () //'])
+except ValueError:
+pass
+except ImportError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ValueError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# What happens when no module can be found for the given name?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_module_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromNames(['sdasfasfasdf'])
+except ImportError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "No module named sdasfasfasdf")
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ImportError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# What happens when the module can be found, but not the attribute?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_attr_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromNames(['unittest.sdasfasfasdf', 'unittest'])
+except AttributeError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'")
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise AttributeError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+# ...
+# "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+#
+# What happens when given an unknown attribute on a specified `module`
+# argument?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_name_relative_1(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromNames(['sdasfasfasdf'], unittest)
+except AttributeError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'")
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+# ...
+# "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+#
+# Do unknown attributes (relative to a provided module) still raise an
+# exception even in the presence of valid attribute names?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_name_relative_2(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromNames(['TestCase', 'sdasfasfasdf'], unittest)
+except AttributeError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'")
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+# ...
+# "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+#
+# What happens when faced with the empty string?
+#
+# XXX This currently raises AttributeError, though ValueError is probably
+# more appropriate
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_empty_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromNames([''], unittest)
+except AttributeError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("Failed to raise ValueError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+# ...
+# "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+#
+# What happens when presented with an impossible attribute name?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_malformed_name(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+# XXX Should this raise AttributeError or ValueError?
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromNames(['abc () //'], unittest)
+except AttributeError:
+pass
+except ValueError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ValueError")
+# "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+#
+# Does loadTestsFromNames() make sure the provided `module` is in fact
+# a module?
+#
+# XXX This validation is currently not done. This flexibility should
+# either be documented or a TypeError should be raised.
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_not_a_module(self):
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+class NotAModule(object):
+test_2 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['test_2'], NotAModule)
+reference = [unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])]
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), reference)
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+# a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+# within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+# TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+#
+# Does it raise an exception if the name resolves to an invalid
+# object?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_bad_object(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+m.testcase_1 = object()
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1'], m)
+except TypeError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("Should have raised TypeError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+# ... a test case class"
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_TestCase_subclass(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1'], m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+expected = loader.suiteClass([MyTestCase('test')])
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [expected])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+# ... a TestSuite instance"
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_TestSuite(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+m.testsuite = unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testsuite'], m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [m.testsuite])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to ... a
+# test method within a test case class"
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_testmethod(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1.test'], m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+ref_suite = unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [ref_suite])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to ... a
+# test method within a test case class"
+#
+# Does the method gracefully handle names that initially look like they
+# resolve to "a test method within a test case class" but don't?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_invalid_testmethod(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1.testfoo'], m)
+except AttributeError, e:
+self.assertEqual(str(e), "type object 'MyTestCase' has no attribute 'testfoo'")
+else:
+self.fail("Failed to raise AttributeError")
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+# ... a callable object which returns a ... TestSuite instance"
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__TestSuite(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+testcase_2 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+def return_TestSuite():
+return unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1, testcase_2])
+m.return_TestSuite = return_TestSuite
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['return_TestSuite'], m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+expected = unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1, testcase_2])
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [expected])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+# ... a callable object which returns a TestCase ... instance"
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__TestCase_instance(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+def return_TestCase():
+return testcase_1
+m.return_TestCase = return_TestCase
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['return_TestCase'], m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+ref_suite = unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1])
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [ref_suite])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+# ... a callable object which returns a TestCase or TestSuite instance"
+#
+# Are staticmethods handled correctly?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__call_staticmethod(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class Test1(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+testcase_1 = Test1('test')
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+@staticmethod
+def foo():
+return testcase_1
+m.Foo = Foo
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo.foo'], m)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+ref_suite = unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1])
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [ref_suite])
+# "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+# ... a callable object which returns a TestCase or TestSuite instance"
+#
+# What happens when the callable returns something else?
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__wrong_type(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+def return_wrong():
+return 6
+m.return_wrong = return_wrong
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['return_wrong'], m)
+except TypeError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise TypeError")
+# "The specifier can refer to modules and packages which have not been
+# imported; they will be imported as a side-effect"
+def test_loadTestsFromNames__module_not_loaded(self):
+# We're going to try to load this module as a side-effect, so it
+# better not be loaded before we try.
+#
+# Why pick audioop? Google shows it isn't used very often, so there's
+# a good chance that it won't be imported when this test is run
+module_name = 'audioop'
+import sys
+if module_name in sys.modules:
+del sys.modules[module_name]
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+try:
+suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames([module_name])
+self.failUnless(isinstance(suite, loader.suiteClass))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [unittest.TestSuite()])
+# audioop should now be loaded, thanks to loadTestsFromName()
+self.failUnless(module_name in sys.modules)
+finally:
+if module_name in sys.modules:
+del sys.modules[module_name]
+################################################################
+### /Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames()
+### Tests for TestLoader.getTestCaseNames()
+################################################################
+# "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass"
+#
+# Test.foobar is defined to make sure getTestCaseNames() respects
+# loader.testMethodPrefix
+def test_getTestCaseNames(self):
+class Test(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foobar(self): pass
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(Test), ['test_1', 'test_2'])
+# "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass"
+#
+# Does getTestCaseNames() behave appropriately if no tests are found?
+def test_getTestCaseNames__no_tests(self):
+class Test(unittest.TestCase):
+def foobar(self): pass
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(Test), [])
+# "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass"
+#
+# Are not-TestCases handled gracefully?
+#
+# XXX This should raise a TypeError, not return a list
+#
+# XXX It's too late in the 2.5 release cycle to fix this, but it should
+# probably be revisited for 2.6
+def test_getTestCaseNames__not_a_TestCase(self):
+class BadCase(int):
+def test_foo(self):
+pass
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+names = loader.getTestCaseNames(BadCase)
+self.assertEqual(names, ['test_foo'])
+# "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass"
+#
+# Make sure inherited names are handled.
+#
+# TestP.foobar is defined to make sure getTestCaseNames() respects
+# loader.testMethodPrefix
+def test_getTestCaseNames__inheritance(self):
+class TestP(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foobar(self): pass
+class TestC(TestP):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_3(self): pass
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+names = ['test_1', 'test_2', 'test_3']
+self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(TestC), names)
+################################################################
+### /Tests for TestLoader.getTestCaseNames()
+### Tests for TestLoader.testMethodPrefix
+################################################################
+# "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as
+# test methods"
+#
+# Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by
+# all loadTestsFrom* methods.
+def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromTestCase(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foo_bar(self): pass
+tests_1 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')])
+tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo'
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests_1)
+loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test'
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests_2)
+# "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as
+# test methods"
+#
+# Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by
+# all loadTestsFrom* methods.
+def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromModule(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foo_bar(self): pass
+m.Foo = Foo
+tests_1 = [unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')])]
+tests_2 = [unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])]
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo'
+self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)), tests_1)
+loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test'
+self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)), tests_2)
+# "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as
+# test methods"
+#
+# Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by
+# all loadTestsFrom* methods.
+def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromName(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foo_bar(self): pass
+m.Foo = Foo
+tests_1 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')])
+tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo'
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests_1)
+loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test'
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests_2)
+# "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as
+# test methods"
+#
+# Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by
+# all loadTestsFrom* methods.
+def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromNames(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foo_bar(self): pass
+m.Foo = Foo
+tests_1 = unittest.TestSuite([unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')])])
+tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])
+tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([tests_2])
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo'
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m), tests_1)
+loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test'
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m), tests_2)
+# "The default value is 'test'"
+def test_testMethodPrefix__default_value(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+self.failUnless(loader.testMethodPrefix == 'test')
+################################################################
+### /Tests for TestLoader.testMethodPrefix
+### Tests for TestLoader.sortTestMethodsUsing
+################################################################
+# "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in
+# getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods"
+def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromTestCase(self):
+def reversed_cmp(x, y):
+return -cmp(x, y)
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp
+tests = loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')])
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests)
+# "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in
+# getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods"
+def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromModule(self):
+def reversed_cmp(x, y):
+return -cmp(x, y)
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+m.Foo = Foo
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp
+tests = [loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')])]
+self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)), tests)
+# "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in
+# getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods"
+def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromName(self):
+def reversed_cmp(x, y):
+return -cmp(x, y)
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+m.Foo = Foo
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp
+tests = loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')])
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests)
+# "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in
+# getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods"
+def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromNames(self):
+def reversed_cmp(x, y):
+return -cmp(x, y)
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+m.Foo = Foo
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp
+tests = [loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')])]
+self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m)), tests)
+# "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in
+# getTestCaseNames()"
+#
+# Does it actually affect getTestCaseNames()?
+def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__getTestCaseNames(self):
+def reversed_cmp(x, y):
+return -cmp(x, y)
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp
+test_names = ['test_2', 'test_1']
+self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(Foo), test_names)
+# "The default value is the built-in cmp() function"
+def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__default_value(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+self.failUnless(loader.sortTestMethodsUsing is cmp)
+# "it can be set to None to disable the sort."
+#
+# XXX How is this different from reassigning cmp? Are the tests returned
+# in a random order or something? This behaviour should die
+def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__None(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = None
+test_names = ['test_2', 'test_1']
+self.assertEqual(set(loader.getTestCaseNames(Foo)), set(test_names))
+################################################################
+### /Tests for TestLoader.sortTestMethodsUsing
+### Tests for TestLoader.suiteClass
+################################################################
+# "Callable object that constructs a test suite from a list of tests."
+def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromTestCase(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foo_bar(self): pass
+tests = [Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.suiteClass = list
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests)
+# It is implicit in the documentation for TestLoader.suiteClass that
+# all TestLoader.loadTestsFrom* methods respect it. Let's make sure
+def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromModule(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foo_bar(self): pass
+m.Foo = Foo
+tests = [[Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]]
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.suiteClass = list
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m), tests)
+# It is implicit in the documentation for TestLoader.suiteClass that
+# all TestLoader.loadTestsFrom* methods respect it. Let's make sure
+def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromName(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foo_bar(self): pass
+m.Foo = Foo
+tests = [Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.suiteClass = list
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests)
+# It is implicit in the documentation for TestLoader.suiteClass that
+# all TestLoader.loadTestsFrom* methods respect it. Let's make sure
+def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromNames(self):
+m = types.ModuleType('m')
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def foo_bar(self): pass
+m.Foo = Foo
+tests = [[Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]]
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+loader.suiteClass = list
+self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m), tests)
+# "The default value is the TestSuite class"
+def test_suiteClass__default_value(self):
+loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+self.failUnless(loader.suiteClass is unittest.TestSuite)
+################################################################
+### /Tests for TestLoader.suiteClass
+### Support code for Test_TestSuite
+################################################################
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+def test_3(self): pass
+def runTest(self): pass
+def _mk_TestSuite(*names):
+return unittest.TestSuite(Foo(n) for n in names)
+################################################################
+### /Support code for Test_TestSuite
+class Test_TestSuite(TestCase, TestEquality):
+### Set up attributes needed by inherited tests
+################################################################
+# Used by TestEquality.test_eq
+eq_pairs = [(unittest.TestSuite(), unittest.TestSuite())
+,(unittest.TestSuite(), unittest.TestSuite([]))
+,(_mk_TestSuite('test_1'), _mk_TestSuite('test_1'))]
+# Used by TestEquality.test_ne
+ne_pairs = [(unittest.TestSuite(), _mk_TestSuite('test_1'))
+,(unittest.TestSuite([]), _mk_TestSuite('test_1'))
+,(_mk_TestSuite('test_1', 'test_2'), _mk_TestSuite('test_1', 'test_3'))
+,(_mk_TestSuite('test_1'), _mk_TestSuite('test_2'))]
+################################################################
+### /Set up attributes needed by inherited tests
+### Tests for TestSuite.__init__
+################################################################
+# "class TestSuite([tests])"
+#
+# The tests iterable should be optional
+def test_init__tests_optional(self):
+suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+self.assertEqual(suite.countTestCases(), 0)
+# "class TestSuite([tests])"
+# ...
+# "If tests is given, it must be an iterable of individual test cases
+# or other test suites that will be used to build the suite initially"
+#
+# TestSuite should deal with empty tests iterables by allowing the
+# creation of an empty suite
+def test_init__empty_tests(self):
+suite = unittest.TestSuite([])
+self.assertEqual(suite.countTestCases(), 0)
+# "class TestSuite([tests])"
+# ...
+# "If tests is given, it must be an iterable of individual test cases
+# or other test suites that will be used to build the suite initially"
+#
+# TestSuite should allow any iterable to provide tests
+def test_init__tests_from_any_iterable(self):
+def tests():
+yield unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+yield unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+suite_1 = unittest.TestSuite(tests())
+self.assertEqual(suite_1.countTestCases(), 2)
+suite_2 = unittest.TestSuite(suite_1)
+self.assertEqual(suite_2.countTestCases(), 2)
+suite_3 = unittest.TestSuite(set(suite_1))
+self.assertEqual(suite_3.countTestCases(), 2)
+# "class TestSuite([tests])"
+# ...
+# "If tests is given, it must be an iterable of individual test cases
+# or other test suites that will be used to build the suite initially"
+#
+# Does TestSuite() also allow other TestSuite() instances to be present
+# in the tests iterable?
+def test_init__TestSuite_instances_in_tests(self):
+def tests():
+ftc = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+yield unittest.TestSuite([ftc])
+yield unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+suite = unittest.TestSuite(tests())
+self.assertEqual(suite.countTestCases(), 2)
+################################################################
+### /Tests for TestSuite.__init__
+# Container types should support the iter protocol
+def test_iter(self):
+test1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+test2 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+suite = unittest.TestSuite((test1, test2))
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [test1, test2])
+# "Return the number of tests represented by the this test object.
+# ...this method is also implemented by the TestSuite class, which can
+# return larger [greater than 1] values"
+#
+# Presumably an empty TestSuite returns 0?
+def test_countTestCases_zero_simple(self):
+suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+self.assertEqual(suite.countTestCases(), 0)
+# "Return the number of tests represented by the this test object.
+# ...this method is also implemented by the TestSuite class, which can
+# return larger [greater than 1] values"
+#
+# Presumably an empty TestSuite (even if it contains other empty
+# TestSuite instances) returns 0?
+def test_countTestCases_zero_nested(self):
+class Test1(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+suite = unittest.TestSuite([unittest.TestSuite()])
+self.assertEqual(suite.countTestCases(), 0)
+# "Return the number of tests represented by the this test object.
+# ...this method is also implemented by the TestSuite class, which can
+# return larger [greater than 1] values"
+def test_countTestCases_simple(self):
+test1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+test2 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+suite = unittest.TestSuite((test1, test2))
+self.assertEqual(suite.countTestCases(), 2)
+# "Return the number of tests represented by the this test object.
+# ...this method is also implemented by the TestSuite class, which can
+# return larger [greater than 1] values"
+#
+# Make sure this holds for nested TestSuite instances, too
+def test_countTestCases_nested(self):
+class Test1(unittest.TestCase):
+def test1(self): pass
+def test2(self): pass
+test2 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+test3 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+child = unittest.TestSuite((Test1('test2'), test2))
+parent = unittest.TestSuite((test3, child, Test1('test1')))
+self.assertEqual(parent.countTestCases(), 4)
+# "Run the tests associated with this suite, collecting the result into
+# the test result object passed as result."
+#
+# And if there are no tests? What then?
+def test_run__empty_suite(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+suite.run(result)
+self.assertEqual(events, [])
+# "Note that unlike TestCase.run(), TestSuite.run() requires the
+# "result object to be passed in."
+def test_run__requires_result(self):
+suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+try:
+suite.run()
+except TypeError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("Failed to raise TypeError")
+# "Run the tests associated with this suite, collecting the result into
+# the test result object passed as result."
+def test_run(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+class LoggingCase(unittest.TestCase):
+def run(self, result):
+events.append('run %s' % self._testMethodName)
+def test1(self): pass
+def test2(self): pass
+tests = [LoggingCase('test1'), LoggingCase('test2')]
+unittest.TestSuite(tests).run(result)
+self.assertEqual(events, ['run test1', 'run test2'])
+# "Add a TestCase ... to the suite"
+def test_addTest__TestCase(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self): pass
+test = Foo('test')
+suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+suite.addTest(test)
+self.assertEqual(suite.countTestCases(), 1)
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [test])
+# "Add a ... TestSuite to the suite"
+def test_addTest__TestSuite(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self): pass
+suite_2 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test')])
+suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+suite.addTest(suite_2)
+self.assertEqual(suite.countTestCases(), 1)
+self.assertEqual(list(suite), [suite_2])
+# "Add all the tests from an iterable of TestCase and TestSuite
+# instances to this test suite."
+#
+# "This is equivalent to iterating over tests, calling addTest() for
+# each element"
+def test_addTests(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self): pass
+def test_2(self): pass
+test_1 = Foo('test_1')
+test_2 = Foo('test_2')
+inner_suite = unittest.TestSuite([test_2])
+def gen():
+yield test_1
+yield test_2
+yield inner_suite
+suite_1 = unittest.TestSuite()
+suite_1.addTests(gen())
+self.assertEqual(list(suite_1), list(gen()))
+# "This is equivalent to iterating over tests, calling addTest() for
+# each element"
+suite_2 = unittest.TestSuite()
+for t in gen():
+suite_2.addTest(t)
+self.assertEqual(suite_1, suite_2)
+# "Add all the tests from an iterable of TestCase and TestSuite
+# instances to this test suite."
+#
+# What happens if it doesn't get an iterable?
+def test_addTest__noniterable(self):
+suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+try:
+suite.addTests(5)
+except TypeError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("Failed to raise TypeError")
+def test_addTest__noncallable(self):
+suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+self.assertRaises(TypeError, suite.addTest, 5)
+def test_addTest__casesuiteclass(self):
+suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+self.assertRaises(TypeError, suite.addTest, Test_TestSuite)
+self.assertRaises(TypeError, suite.addTest, unittest.TestSuite)
+def test_addTests__string(self):
+suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+self.assertRaises(TypeError, suite.addTests, "foo")
+class Test_FunctionTestCase(TestCase):
+# "Return the number of tests represented by the this test object. For
+# TestCase instances, this will always be 1"
+def test_countTestCases(self):
+test = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+self.assertEqual(test.countTestCases(), 1)
+# "When a setUp() method is defined, the test runner will run that method
+# prior to each test. Likewise, if a tearDown() method is defined, the
+# test runner will invoke that method after each test. In the example,
+# setUp() was used to create a fresh sequence for each test."
+#
+# Make sure the proper call order is maintained, even if setUp() raises
+# an exception.
+def test_run_call_order__error_in_setUp(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+def setUp():
+events.append('setUp')
+raise RuntimeError('raised by setUp')
+def test():
+events.append('test')
+def tearDown():
+events.append('tearDown')
+expected = ['startTest', 'setUp', 'addError', 'stopTest']
+unittest.FunctionTestCase(test, setUp, tearDown).run(result)
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+# "When a setUp() method is defined, the test runner will run that method
+# prior to each test. Likewise, if a tearDown() method is defined, the
+# test runner will invoke that method after each test. In the example,
+# setUp() was used to create a fresh sequence for each test."
+#
+# Make sure the proper call order is maintained, even if the test raises
+# an error (as opposed to a failure).
+def test_run_call_order__error_in_test(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+def setUp():
+events.append('setUp')
+def test():
+events.append('test')
+raise RuntimeError('raised by test')
+def tearDown():
+events.append('tearDown')
+expected = ['startTest', 'setUp', 'test', 'addError', 'tearDown',
+'stopTest']
+unittest.FunctionTestCase(test, setUp, tearDown).run(result)
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+# "When a setUp() method is defined, the test runner will run that method
+# prior to each test. Likewise, if a tearDown() method is defined, the
+# test runner will invoke that method after each test. In the example,
+# setUp() was used to create a fresh sequence for each test."
+#
+# Make sure the proper call order is maintained, even if the test signals
+# a failure (as opposed to an error).
+def test_run_call_order__failure_in_test(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+def setUp():
+events.append('setUp')
+def test():
+events.append('test')
+self.fail('raised by test')
+def tearDown():
+events.append('tearDown')
+expected = ['startTest', 'setUp', 'test', 'addFailure', 'tearDown',
+'stopTest']
+unittest.FunctionTestCase(test, setUp, tearDown).run(result)
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+# "When a setUp() method is defined, the test runner will run that method
+# prior to each test. Likewise, if a tearDown() method is defined, the
+# test runner will invoke that method after each test. In the example,
+# setUp() was used to create a fresh sequence for each test."
+#
+# Make sure the proper call order is maintained, even if tearDown() raises
+# an exception.
+def test_run_call_order__error_in_tearDown(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+def setUp():
+events.append('setUp')
+def test():
+events.append('test')
+def tearDown():
+events.append('tearDown')
+raise RuntimeError('raised by tearDown')
+expected = ['startTest', 'setUp', 'test', 'tearDown', 'addError',
+'stopTest']
+unittest.FunctionTestCase(test, setUp, tearDown).run(result)
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+# "Return a string identifying the specific test case."
+#
+# Because of the vague nature of the docs, I'm not going to lock this
+# test down too much. Really all that can be asserted is that the id()
+# will be a string (either 8-byte or unicode -- again, because the docs
+# just say "string")
+def test_id(self):
+test = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(test.id(), basestring))
+# "Returns a one-line description of the test, or None if no description
+# has been provided. The default implementation of this method returns
+# the first line of the test method's docstring, if available, or None."
+def test_shortDescription__no_docstring(self):
+test = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+self.assertEqual(test.shortDescription(), None)
+# "Returns a one-line description of the test, or None if no description
+# has been provided. The default implementation of this method returns
+# the first line of the test method's docstring, if available, or None."
+def test_shortDescription__singleline_docstring(self):
+desc = "this tests foo"
+test = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None, description=desc)
+self.assertEqual(test.shortDescription(), "this tests foo")
+class Test_TestResult(TestCase):
+# Note: there are not separate tests for TestResult.wasSuccessful(),
+# TestResult.errors, TestResult.failures, TestResult.testsRun or
+# TestResult.shouldStop because these only have meaning in terms of
+# other TestResult methods.
+#
+# Accordingly, tests for the aforenamed attributes are incorporated
+# in with the tests for the defining methods.
+################################################################
+def test_init(self):
+result = unittest.TestResult()
+self.failUnless(result.wasSuccessful())
+self.assertEqual(len(result.errors), 0)
+self.assertEqual(len(result.failures), 0)
+self.assertEqual(result.testsRun, 0)
+self.assertEqual(result.shouldStop, False)
+# "This method can be called to signal that the set of tests being
+# run should be aborted by setting the TestResult's shouldStop
+# attribute to True."
+def test_stop(self):
+result = unittest.TestResult()
+result.stop()
+self.assertEqual(result.shouldStop, True)
+# "Called when the test case test is about to be run. The default
+# implementation simply increments the instance's testsRun counter."
+def test_startTest(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self):
+pass
+test = Foo('test_1')
+result = unittest.TestResult()
+result.startTest(test)
+self.failUnless(result.wasSuccessful())
+self.assertEqual(len(result.errors), 0)
+self.assertEqual(len(result.failures), 0)
+self.assertEqual(result.testsRun, 1)
+self.assertEqual(result.shouldStop, False)
+result.stopTest(test)
+# "Called after the test case test has been executed, regardless of
+# the outcome. The default implementation does nothing."
+def test_stopTest(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self):
+pass
+test = Foo('test_1')
+result = unittest.TestResult()
+result.startTest(test)
+self.failUnless(result.wasSuccessful())
+self.assertEqual(len(result.errors), 0)
+self.assertEqual(len(result.failures), 0)
+self.assertEqual(result.testsRun, 1)
+self.assertEqual(result.shouldStop, False)
+result.stopTest(test)
+# Same tests as above; make sure nothing has changed
+self.failUnless(result.wasSuccessful())
+self.assertEqual(len(result.errors), 0)
+self.assertEqual(len(result.failures), 0)
+self.assertEqual(result.testsRun, 1)
+self.assertEqual(result.shouldStop, False)
+# "addSuccess(test)"
+# ...
+# "Called when the test case test succeeds"
+# ...
+# "wasSuccessful() - Returns True if all tests run so far have passed,
+# otherwise returns False"
+# ...
+# "testsRun - The total number of tests run so far."
+# ...
+# "errors - A list containing 2-tuples of TestCase instances and
+# formatted tracebacks. Each tuple represents a test which raised an
+# unexpected exception. Contains formatted
+# tracebacks instead of sys.exc_info() results."
+# ...
+# "failures - A list containing 2-tuples of TestCase instances and
+# formatted tracebacks. Each tuple represents a test where a failure was
+# explicitly signalled using the TestCase.fail*() or TestCase.assert*()
+# methods. Contains formatted tracebacks instead
+# of sys.exc_info() results."
+def test_addSuccess(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self):
+pass
+test = Foo('test_1')
+result = unittest.TestResult()
+result.startTest(test)
+result.addSuccess(test)
+result.stopTest(test)
+self.failUnless(result.wasSuccessful())
+self.assertEqual(len(result.errors), 0)
+self.assertEqual(len(result.failures), 0)
+self.assertEqual(result.testsRun, 1)
+self.assertEqual(result.shouldStop, False)
+# "addFailure(test, err)"
+# ...
+# "Called when the test case test signals a failure. err is a tuple of
+# the form returned by sys.exc_info(): (type, value, traceback)"
+# ...
+# "wasSuccessful() - Returns True if all tests run so far have passed,
+# otherwise returns False"
+# ...
+# "testsRun - The total number of tests run so far."
+# ...
+# "errors - A list containing 2-tuples of TestCase instances and
+# formatted tracebacks. Each tuple represents a test which raised an
+# unexpected exception. Contains formatted
+# tracebacks instead of sys.exc_info() results."
+# ...
+# "failures - A list containing 2-tuples of TestCase instances and
+# formatted tracebacks. Each tuple represents a test where a failure was
+# explicitly signalled using the TestCase.fail*() or TestCase.assert*()
+# methods. Contains formatted tracebacks instead
+# of sys.exc_info() results."
+def test_addFailure(self):
+import sys
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self):
+pass
+test = Foo('test_1')
+try:
+test.fail("foo")
+except:
+exc_info_tuple = sys.exc_info()
+result = unittest.TestResult()
+result.startTest(test)
+result.addFailure(test, exc_info_tuple)
+result.stopTest(test)
+self.failIf(result.wasSuccessful())
+self.assertEqual(len(result.errors), 0)
+self.assertEqual(len(result.failures), 1)
+self.assertEqual(result.testsRun, 1)
+self.assertEqual(result.shouldStop, False)
+test_case, formatted_exc = result.failures[0]
+self.failUnless(test_case is test)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(formatted_exc, str))
+# "addError(test, err)"
+# ...
+# "Called when the test case test raises an unexpected exception err
+# is a tuple of the form returned by sys.exc_info():
+# (type, value, traceback)"
+# ...
+# "wasSuccessful() - Returns True if all tests run so far have passed,
+# otherwise returns False"
+# ...
+# "testsRun - The total number of tests run so far."
+# ...
+# "errors - A list containing 2-tuples of TestCase instances and
+# formatted tracebacks. Each tuple represents a test which raised an
+# unexpected exception. Contains formatted
+# tracebacks instead of sys.exc_info() results."
+# ...
+# "failures - A list containing 2-tuples of TestCase instances and
+# formatted tracebacks. Each tuple represents a test where a failure was
+# explicitly signalled using the TestCase.fail*() or TestCase.assert*()
+# methods. Contains formatted tracebacks instead
+# of sys.exc_info() results."
+def test_addError(self):
+import sys
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test_1(self):
+pass
+test = Foo('test_1')
+try:
+raise TypeError()
+except:
+exc_info_tuple = sys.exc_info()
+result = unittest.TestResult()
+result.startTest(test)
+result.addError(test, exc_info_tuple)
+result.stopTest(test)
+self.failIf(result.wasSuccessful())
+self.assertEqual(len(result.errors), 1)
+self.assertEqual(len(result.failures), 0)
+self.assertEqual(result.testsRun, 1)
+self.assertEqual(result.shouldStop, False)
+test_case, formatted_exc = result.errors[0]
+self.failUnless(test_case is test)
+self.failUnless(isinstance(formatted_exc, str))
+### Support code for Test_TestCase
+################################################################
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self): pass
+def test1(self): pass
+class Bar(Foo):
+def test2(self): pass
+################################################################
+### /Support code for Test_TestCase
+class Test_TestCase(TestCase, TestEquality, TestHashing):
+### Set up attributes used by inherited tests
+################################################################
+# Used by TestHashing.test_hash and TestEquality.test_eq
+eq_pairs = [(Foo('test1'), Foo('test1'))]
+# Used by TestEquality.test_ne
+ne_pairs = [(Foo('test1'), Foo('runTest'))
+,(Foo('test1'), Bar('test1'))
+,(Foo('test1'), Bar('test2'))]
+################################################################
+### /Set up attributes used by inherited tests
+# "class TestCase([methodName])"
+# ...
+# "Each instance of TestCase will run a single test method: the
+# method named methodName."
+# ...
+# "methodName defaults to "runTest"."
+#
+# Make sure it really is optional, and that it defaults to the proper
+# thing.
+def test_init__no_test_name(self):
+class Test(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self): raise MyException()
+def test(self): pass
+self.assertEqual(Test().id()[-13:], '.Test.runTest')
+# "class TestCase([methodName])"
+# ...
+# "Each instance of TestCase will run a single test method: the
+# method named methodName."
+def test_init__test_name__valid(self):
+class Test(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self): raise MyException()
+def test(self): pass
+self.assertEqual(Test('test').id()[-10:], '.Test.test')
+# "class TestCase([methodName])"
+# ...
+# "Each instance of TestCase will run a single test method: the
+# method named methodName."
+def test_init__test_name__invalid(self):
+class Test(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self): raise MyException()
+def test(self): pass
+try:
+Test('testfoo')
+except ValueError:
+pass
+else:
+self.fail("Failed to raise ValueError")
+# "Return the number of tests represented by the this test object. For
+# TestCase instances, this will always be 1"
+def test_countTestCases(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self): pass
+self.assertEqual(Foo('test').countTestCases(), 1)
+# "Return the default type of test result object to be used to run this
+# test. For TestCase instances, this will always be
+# unittest.TestResult;  subclasses of TestCase should
+# override this as necessary."
+def test_defaultTestResult(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self):
+pass
+result = Foo().defaultTestResult()
+self.assertEqual(type(result), unittest.TestResult)
+# "When a setUp() method is defined, the test runner will run that method
+# prior to each test. Likewise, if a tearDown() method is defined, the
+# test runner will invoke that method after each test. In the example,
+# setUp() was used to create a fresh sequence for each test."
+#
+# Make sure the proper call order is maintained, even if setUp() raises
+# an exception.
+def test_run_call_order__error_in_setUp(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def setUp(self):
+events.append('setUp')
+raise RuntimeError('raised by Foo.setUp')
+def test(self):
+events.append('test')
+def tearDown(self):
+events.append('tearDown')
+Foo('test').run(result)
+expected = ['startTest', 'setUp', 'addError', 'stopTest']
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+# "When a setUp() method is defined, the test runner will run that method
+# prior to each test. Likewise, if a tearDown() method is defined, the
+# test runner will invoke that method after each test. In the example,
+# setUp() was used to create a fresh sequence for each test."
+#
+# Make sure the proper call order is maintained, even if the test raises
+# an error (as opposed to a failure).
+def test_run_call_order__error_in_test(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def setUp(self):
+events.append('setUp')
+def test(self):
+events.append('test')
+raise RuntimeError('raised by Foo.test')
+def tearDown(self):
+events.append('tearDown')
+expected = ['startTest', 'setUp', 'test', 'addError', 'tearDown',
+'stopTest']
+Foo('test').run(result)
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+# "When a setUp() method is defined, the test runner will run that method
+# prior to each test. Likewise, if a tearDown() method is defined, the
+# test runner will invoke that method after each test. In the example,
+# setUp() was used to create a fresh sequence for each test."
+#
+# Make sure the proper call order is maintained, even if the test signals
+# a failure (as opposed to an error).
+def test_run_call_order__failure_in_test(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def setUp(self):
+events.append('setUp')
+def test(self):
+events.append('test')
+self.fail('raised by Foo.test')
+def tearDown(self):
+events.append('tearDown')
+expected = ['startTest', 'setUp', 'test', 'addFailure', 'tearDown',
+'stopTest']
+Foo('test').run(result)
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+# "When a setUp() method is defined, the test runner will run that method
+# prior to each test. Likewise, if a tearDown() method is defined, the
+# test runner will invoke that method after each test. In the example,
+# setUp() was used to create a fresh sequence for each test."
+#
+# Make sure the proper call order is maintained, even if tearDown() raises
+# an exception.
+def test_run_call_order__error_in_tearDown(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def setUp(self):
+events.append('setUp')
+def test(self):
+events.append('test')
+def tearDown(self):
+events.append('tearDown')
+raise RuntimeError('raised by Foo.tearDown')
+Foo('test').run(result)
+expected = ['startTest', 'setUp', 'test', 'tearDown', 'addError',
+'stopTest']
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+# "This class attribute gives the exception raised by the test() method.
+# If a test framework needs to use a specialized exception, possibly to
+# carry additional information, it must subclass this exception in
+# order to ``play fair'' with the framework.  The initial value of this
+# attribute is AssertionError"
+def test_failureException__default(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+pass
+self.failUnless(Foo('test').failureException is AssertionError)
+# "This class attribute gives the exception raised by the test() method.
+# If a test framework needs to use a specialized exception, possibly to
+# carry additional information, it must subclass this exception in
+# order to ``play fair'' with the framework."
+#
+# Make sure TestCase.run() respects the designated failureException
+def test_failureException__subclassing__explicit_raise(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+raise RuntimeError()
+failureException = RuntimeError
+self.failUnless(Foo('test').failureException is RuntimeError)
+Foo('test').run(result)
+expected = ['startTest', 'addFailure', 'stopTest']
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+# "This class attribute gives the exception raised by the test() method.
+# If a test framework needs to use a specialized exception, possibly to
+# carry additional information, it must subclass this exception in
+# order to ``play fair'' with the framework."
+#
+# Make sure TestCase.run() respects the designated failureException
+def test_failureException__subclassing__implicit_raise(self):
+events = []
+result = LoggingResult(events)
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+self.fail("foo")
+failureException = RuntimeError
+self.failUnless(Foo('test').failureException is RuntimeError)
+Foo('test').run(result)
+expected = ['startTest', 'addFailure', 'stopTest']
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+# "The default implementation does nothing."
+def test_setUp(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self):
+pass
+# ... and nothing should happen
+Foo().setUp()
+# "The default implementation does nothing."
+def test_tearDown(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self):
+pass
+# ... and nothing should happen
+Foo().tearDown()
+# "Return a string identifying the specific test case."
+#
+# Because of the vague nature of the docs, I'm not going to lock this
+# test down too much. Really all that can be asserted is that the id()
+# will be a string (either 8-byte or unicode -- again, because the docs
+# just say "string")
+def test_id(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self):
+pass
+self.failUnless(isinstance(Foo().id(), basestring))
+# "Returns a one-line description of the test, or None if no description
+# has been provided. The default implementation of this method returns
+# the first line of the test method's docstring, if available, or None."
+def test_shortDescription__no_docstring(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self):
+pass
+self.assertEqual(Foo().shortDescription(), None)
+# "Returns a one-line description of the test, or None if no description
+# has been provided. The default implementation of this method returns
+# the first line of the test method's docstring, if available, or None."
+def test_shortDescription__singleline_docstring(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self):
+"this tests foo"
+pass
+self.assertEqual(Foo().shortDescription(), "this tests foo")
+# "Returns a one-line description of the test, or None if no description
+# has been provided. The default implementation of this method returns
+# the first line of the test method's docstring, if available, or None."
+def test_shortDescription__multiline_docstring(self):
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def runTest(self):
+"""this tests foo
+blah, bar and baz are also tested"""
+pass
+self.assertEqual(Foo().shortDescription(), "this tests foo")
+# "If result is omitted or None, a temporary result object is created
+# and used, but is not made available to the caller"
+def test_run__uses_defaultTestResult(self):
+events = []
+class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+def test(self):
+events.append('test')
+def defaultTestResult(self):
+return LoggingResult(events)
+# Make run() find a result object on its own
+Foo('test').run()
+expected = ['startTest', 'test', 'stopTest']
+self.assertEqual(events, expected)
+class Test_Assertions(TestCase):
+def test_AlmostEqual(self):
+self.failUnlessAlmostEqual(1.00000001, 1.0)
+self.failIfAlmostEqual(1.0000001, 1.0)
+self.assertRaises(AssertionError,
+self.failUnlessAlmostEqual, 1.0000001, 1.0)
+self.assertRaises(AssertionError,
+self.failIfAlmostEqual, 1.00000001, 1.0)
+self.failUnlessAlmostEqual(1.1, 1.0, places=0)
+self.assertRaises(AssertionError,
+self.failUnlessAlmostEqual, 1.1, 1.0, places=1)
+self.failUnlessAlmostEqual(0, .1+.1j, places=0)
+self.failIfAlmostEqual(0, .1+.1j, places=1)
+self.assertRaises(AssertionError,
+self.failUnlessAlmostEqual, 0, .1+.1j, places=1)
+self.assertRaises(AssertionError,
+self.failIfAlmostEqual, 0, .1+.1j, places=0)
+######################################################################
+## Main
+######################################################################
+def test_main():
+test_support.run_unittest(Test_TestCase, Test_TestLoader,
+Test_TestSuite, Test_TestResult, Test_FunctionTestCase,
+Test_Assertions)
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+test_main()