--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/symbian-qemu-0.9.1-12/libsdl-trunk/test/utf8.txt Fri Jul 31 15:01:17 2009 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,287 @@
+UTF-8 decoder capability and stress test
+----------------------------------------
+
+Markus Kuhn <http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/> - 2003-02-19
+
+This test file can help you examine, how your UTF-8 decoder handles
+various types of correct, malformed, or otherwise interesting UTF-8
+sequences. This file is not meant to be a conformance test. It does
+not prescribes any particular outcome and therefore there is no way to
+"pass" or "fail" this test file, even though the texts suggests a
+preferable decoder behaviour at some places. The aim is instead to
+help you think about and test the behaviour of your UTF-8 on a
+systematic collection of unusual inputs. Experience so far suggests
+that most first-time authors of UTF-8 decoders find at least one
+serious problem in their decoder by using this file.
+
+The test lines below cover boundary conditions, malformed UTF-8
+sequences as well as correctly encoded UTF-8 sequences of Unicode code
+points that should never occur in a correct UTF-8 file.
+
+According to ISO 10646-1:2000, sections D.7 and 2.3c, a device
+receiving UTF-8 shall interpret a "malformed sequence in the same way
+that it interprets a character that is outside the adopted subset" and
+"characters that are not within the adopted subset shall be indicated
+to the user" by a receiving device. A quite commonly used approach in
+UTF-8 decoders is to replace any malformed UTF-8 sequence by a
+replacement character (U+FFFD), which looks a bit like an inverted
+question mark, or a similar symbol. It might be a good idea to
+visually distinguish a malformed UTF-8 sequence from a correctly
+encoded Unicode character that is just not available in the current
+font but otherwise fully legal, even though ISO 10646-1 doesn't
+mandate this. In any case, just ignoring malformed sequences or
+unavailable characters does not conform to ISO 10646, will make
+debugging more difficult, and can lead to user confusion.
+
+Please check, whether a malformed UTF-8 sequence is (1) represented at
+all, (2) represented by exactly one single replacement character (or
+equivalent signal), and (3) the following quotation mark after an
+illegal UTF-8 sequence is correctly displayed, i.e. proper
+resynchronization takes place immageately after any malformed
+sequence. This file says "THE END" in the last line, so if you don't
+see that, your decoder crashed somehow before, which should always be
+cause for concern.
+
+All lines in this file are exactly 79 characters long (plus the line
+feed). In addition, all lines end with "|", except for the two test
+lines 2.1.1 and 2.2.1, which contain non-printable ASCII controls
+U+0000 and U+007F. If you display this file with a fixed-width font,
+these "|" characters should all line up in column 79 (right margin).
+This allows you to test quickly, whether your UTF-8 decoder finds the
+correct number of characters in every line, that is whether each
+malformed sequences is replaced by a single replacement character.
+
+Note that as an alternative to the notion of malformed sequence used
+here, it is also a perfectly acceptable (and in some situations even
+preferable) solution to represent each individual byte of a malformed
+sequence by a replacement character. If you follow this strategy in
+your decoder, then please ignore the "|" column.
+
+
+Here come the tests: |
+ |
+1 Some correct UTF-8 text |
+ |
+(The codepoints for this test are: |
+ U+03BA U+1F79 U+03C3 U+03BC U+03B5 --ryan.) |
+ |
+You should see the Greek word 'kosme': "κόσμε" |
+ |
+ |
+2 Boundary condition test cases |
+ |
+2.1 First possible sequence of a certain length |
+ |
+(byte zero skipped...there's a null added at the end of the test. --ryan.) |
+ |
+2.1.2 2 bytes (U-00000080): "" |
+2.1.3 3 bytes (U-00000800): "ࠀ" |
+2.1.4 4 bytes (U-00010000): "𐀀" |
+ |
+(5 and 6 byte sequences were made illegal in rfc3629. --ryan.) |
+2.1.5 5 bytes (U-00200000): "" |
+2.1.6 6 bytes (U-04000000): "" |
+ |
+2.2 Last possible sequence of a certain length |
+ |
+2.2.1 1 byte (U-0000007F): "" |
+2.2.2 2 bytes (U-000007FF): "߿" |
+ |
+(Section 5.3.2 below calls this illegal. --ryan.) |
+2.2.3 3 bytes (U-0000FFFF): "" |
+ |
+(5 and 6 bytes sequences, and 4 bytes sequences > 0x10FFFF were made illegal |
+ in rfc3629, so these next three should be replaced with a invalid |
+ character codepoint. --ryan.) |
+2.2.4 4 bytes (U-001FFFFF): "" |
+2.2.5 5 bytes (U-03FFFFFF): "" |
+2.2.6 6 bytes (U-7FFFFFFF): "" |
+ |
+2.3 Other boundary conditions |
+ |
+2.3.1 U-0000D7FF = ed 9f bf = "" |
+2.3.2 U-0000E000 = ee 80 80 = "" |
+2.3.3 U-0000FFFD = ef bf bd = "�" |
+2.3.4 U-0010FFFF = f4 8f bf bf = "" |
+ |
+(This one is bogus in rfc3629. --ryan.) |
+2.3.5 U-00110000 = f4 90 80 80 = "" |
+ |
+3 Malformed sequences |
+ |
+3.1 Unexpected continuation bytes |
+ |
+Each unexpected continuation byte should be separately signalled as a |
+malformed sequence of its own. |
+ |
+3.1.1 First continuation byte 0x80: "" |
+3.1.2 Last continuation byte 0xbf: "" |
+ |
+3.1.3 2 continuation bytes: "" |
+3.1.4 3 continuation bytes: "" |
+3.1.5 4 continuation bytes: "" |
+3.1.6 5 continuation bytes: "" |
+3.1.7 6 continuation bytes: "" |
+3.1.8 7 continuation bytes: "" |
+ |
+3.1.9 Sequence of all 64 possible continuation bytes (0x80-0xbf): |
+ |
+ " |
+ |
+ |
+ " |
+ |
+3.2 Lonely start characters |
+ |
+3.2.1 All 32 first bytes of 2-byte sequences (0xc0-0xdf), |
+ each followed by a space character: |
+ |
+ " |
+ " |
+ |
+3.2.2 All 16 first bytes of 3-byte sequences (0xe0-0xef), |
+ each followed by a space character: |
+ |
+ " " |
+ |
+3.2.3 All 8 first bytes of 4-byte sequences (0xf0-0xf7), |
+ each followed by a space character: |
+ |
+ " " |
+ |
+3.2.4 All 4 first bytes of 5-byte sequences (0xf8-0xfb), |
+ each followed by a space character: |
+ |
+ " " |
+ |
+3.2.5 All 2 first bytes of 6-byte sequences (0xfc-0xfd), |
+ each followed by a space character: |
+ |
+ " " |
+ |
+3.3 Sequences with last continuation byte missing |
+ |
+All bytes of an incomplete sequence should be signalled as a single |
+malformed sequence, i.e., you should see only a single replacement |
+character in each of the next 10 tests. (Characters as in section 2) |
+ |
+3.3.1 2-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "" |
+3.3.2 3-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "" |
+3.3.3 4-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "" |
+3.3.4 5-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "" |
+3.3.5 6-byte sequence with last byte missing (U+0000): "" |
+3.3.6 2-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-000007FF): "" |
+3.3.7 3-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-0000FFFF): "" |
+3.3.8 4-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-001FFFFF): "" |
+3.3.9 5-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-03FFFFFF): "" |
+3.3.10 6-byte sequence with last byte missing (U-7FFFFFFF): "" |
+ |
+3.4 Concatenation of incomplete sequences |
+ |
+All the 10 sequences of 3.3 concatenated, you should see 10 malformed |
+sequences being signalled: |
+ |
+ "" |
+ |
+3.5 Impossible bytes |
+ |
+The following two bytes cannot appear in a correct UTF-8 string |
+ |
+3.5.1 fe = "" |
+3.5.2 ff = "" |
+3.5.3 fe fe ff ff = "" |
+ |
+4 Overlong sequences |
+ |
+The following sequences are not malformed according to the letter of |
+the Unicode 2.0 standard. However, they are longer then necessary and |
+a correct UTF-8 encoder is not allowed to produce them. A "safe UTF-8 |
+decoder" should reject them just like malformed sequences for two |
+reasons: (1) It helps to debug applications if overlong sequences are |
+not treated as valid representations of characters, because this helps |
+to spot problems more quickly. (2) Overlong sequences provide |
+alternative representations of characters, that could maliciously be |
+used to bypass filters that check only for ASCII characters. For |
+instance, a 2-byte encoded line feed (LF) would not be caught by a |
+line counter that counts only 0x0a bytes, but it would still be |
+processed as a line feed by an unsafe UTF-8 decoder later in the |
+pipeline. From a security point of view, ASCII compatibility of UTF-8 |
+sequences means also, that ASCII characters are *only* allowed to be |
+represented by ASCII bytes in the range 0x00-0x7f. To ensure this |
+aspect of ASCII compatibility, use only "safe UTF-8 decoders" that |
+reject overlong UTF-8 sequences for which a shorter encoding exists. |
+ |
+4.1 Examples of an overlong ASCII character |
+ |
+With a safe UTF-8 decoder, all of the following five overlong |
+representations of the ASCII character slash ("/") should be rejected |
+like a malformed UTF-8 sequence, for instance by substituting it with |
+a replacement character. If you see a slash below, you do not have a |
+safe UTF-8 decoder! |
+ |
+4.1.1 U+002F = c0 af = "" |
+4.1.2 U+002F = e0 80 af = "" |
+4.1.3 U+002F = f0 80 80 af = "" |
+4.1.4 U+002F = f8 80 80 80 af = "" |
+4.1.5 U+002F = fc 80 80 80 80 af = "" |
+ |
+4.2 Maximum overlong sequences |
+ |
+Below you see the highest Unicode value that is still resulting in an |
+overlong sequence if represented with the given number of bytes. This |
+is a boundary test for safe UTF-8 decoders. All five characters should |
+be rejected like malformed UTF-8 sequences. |
+ |
+4.2.1 U-0000007F = c1 bf = "" |
+4.2.2 U-000007FF = e0 9f bf = "" |
+4.2.3 U-0000FFFF = f0 8f bf bf = "" |
+4.2.4 U-001FFFFF = f8 87 bf bf bf = "" |
+4.2.5 U-03FFFFFF = fc 83 bf bf bf bf = "" |
+ |
+4.3 Overlong representation of the NUL character |
+ |
+The following five sequences should also be rejected like malformed |
+UTF-8 sequences and should not be treated like the ASCII NUL |
+character. |
+ |
+4.3.1 U+0000 = c0 80 = "" |
+4.3.2 U+0000 = e0 80 80 = "" |
+4.3.3 U+0000 = f0 80 80 80 = "" |
+4.3.4 U+0000 = f8 80 80 80 80 = "" |
+4.3.5 U+0000 = fc 80 80 80 80 80 = "" |
+ |
+5 Illegal code positions |
+ |
+The following UTF-8 sequences should be rejected like malformed |
+sequences, because they never represent valid ISO 10646 characters and |
+a UTF-8 decoder that accepts them might introduce security problems |
+comparable to overlong UTF-8 sequences. |
+ |
+5.1 Single UTF-16 surrogates |
+ |
+5.1.1 U+D800 = ed a0 80 = "" |
+5.1.2 U+DB7F = ed ad bf = "" |
+5.1.3 U+DB80 = ed ae 80 = "" |
+5.1.4 U+DBFF = ed af bf = "" |
+5.1.5 U+DC00 = ed b0 80 = "" |
+5.1.6 U+DF80 = ed be 80 = "" |
+5.1.7 U+DFFF = ed bf bf = "" |
+ |
+5.2 Paired UTF-16 surrogates |
+ |
+5.2.1 U+D800 U+DC00 = ed a0 80 ed b0 80 = "" |
+5.2.2 U+D800 U+DFFF = ed a0 80 ed bf bf = "" |
+5.2.3 U+DB7F U+DC00 = ed ad bf ed b0 80 = "" |
+5.2.4 U+DB7F U+DFFF = ed ad bf ed bf bf = "" |
+5.2.5 U+DB80 U+DC00 = ed ae 80 ed b0 80 = "" |
+5.2.6 U+DB80 U+DFFF = ed ae 80 ed bf bf = "" |
+5.2.7 U+DBFF U+DC00 = ed af bf ed b0 80 = "" |
+5.2.8 U+DBFF U+DFFF = ed af bf ed bf bf = "" |
+ |
+5.3 Other illegal code positions |
+ |
+5.3.1 U+FFFE = ef bf be = "" |
+5.3.2 U+FFFF = ef bf bf = "" |
+ |
+THE END |
+