diff -r ffa851df0825 -r 2fb8b9db1c86 symbian-qemu-0.9.1-12/python-2.6.1/Doc/howto/webservers.rst --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/symbian-qemu-0.9.1-12/python-2.6.1/Doc/howto/webservers.rst Fri Jul 31 15:01:17 2009 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,697 @@ +******************************* + HOWTO Use Python in the web +******************************* + +:Author: Marek Kubica + +.. topic:: Abstract + + This document shows how Python fits into the web. It presents some ways on + how to integrate Python with the web server and general practices useful for + developing web sites. + + +Programming for the Web has become a hot topic since the raise of the "Web 2.0", +which focuses on user-generated content on web sites. It has always been +possible to use Python for creating web sites, but it was a rather tedious task. +Therefore, many so-called "frameworks" and helper tools were created to help +developers creating sites faster and these sites being more robust. This HOWTO +describes some of the methods used to combine Python with a web server to create +dynamic content. It is not meant as a general introduction as this topic is far +too broad to be covered in one single document. However, a short overview of +the most popular libraries is provided. + +.. seealso:: + + While this HOWTO tries to give an overview over Python in the Web, it cannot + always be as up to date as desired. Web development in Python is moving + forward rapidly, so the wiki page on `Web Programming + `_ might be more in sync with + recent development. + + +The low-level view +================== + +.. .. image:: http.png + +When a user enters a web site, his browser makes a connection to the site's +webserver (this is called the *request*). The server looks up the file in the +file system and sends it back to the user's browser, which displays it (this is +the *response*). This is roughly how the unterlying protocol, HTTP works. + +Now, dynamic web sites are not files in the file system, but rather programs +which are run by the web server when a request comes in. They can do all sorts +of useful things, like display the postings of a bulletin board, show your +mails, configurate software or just display the current time. These programs +can be written in about any programming language the server supports, so it is +easy to use Python for creating dynamic web sites. + +As most of HTTP servers are written in C or C++, they cannot execute Python code +in a simple way -- a bridge is needed between the server and the program. These +bridges or rather interfaces define how programs interact with the server. In +the past there have been numerous attempts to create the best possible +interface, but there are only a few worth mentioning. + +Not every web server supports every interface. Many web servers do support only +old, now-obsolete interfaces. But they can often be extended using some +third-party modules to support new interfaces. + + +Common Gateway Interface +------------------------ + +This interface is the oldest one, supported by nearly every web server out of +the box. Programs using CGI to communicate with their web server need to be +started by the server for every request. So, every request starts a new Python +interpreter -- which takes some time to start up -- thus making the whole +interface only usable for low load situations. + +The upside of CGI is that it is simple -- writing a program which uses CGI is a +matter of about three lines of code. But this simplicity comes at a price: it +does very few things to help the developer. + +Writing CGI programs, while still possible, is not recommended anymore. With +WSGI (more on that later) it is possible to write programs that emulate CGI, so +they can be run as CGI if no better option is available. + +.. seealso:: + + The Python standard library includes some modules that are helpful for + creating plain CGI programs: + + * :mod:`cgi` -- Handling of user input in CGI scripts + * :mod:`cgitb` -- Displays nice tracebacks when errors happen in of CGI + applications, instead of presenting a "500 Internal Server Error" message + + The Python wiki features a page on `CGI scripts + `_ with some additional information + about CGI in Python. + + +Simple script for testing CGI +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +To test whether your web server works with CGI, you can use this short and +simple CGI program:: + + #!/usr/bin/env python + # -*- coding: UTF-8 -*- + + # enable debugging + import cgitb; cgitb.enable() + + print "Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8" + print + + print "Hello World!" + +You need to write this code into a file with a ``.py`` or ``.cgi`` extension, +this depends on your web server configuration. Depending on your web server +configuration, this file may also need to be in a ``cgi-bin`` folder, for +security reasons. + +You might wonder what the ``cgitb`` line is about. This line makes it possible +to display a nice traceback instead of just crashing and displaying an "Internal +Server Error" in the user's browser. This is useful for debugging, but it might +risk exposing some confident data to the user. Don't use it when the script is +ready for production use. Still, you should *always* catch exceptions, and +display proper error pages -- end-users don't like to see nondescript "Internal +Server Errors" in their browsers. + + +Setting up CGI on your own server +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +If you don't have your own web server, this does not apply to you. You can +check whether if works as-is and if not you need to talk to the administrator of +your web server anyway. If it is a big hoster, you can try filing a ticket +asking for Python support. + +If you're your own administrator or want to install it for testing purposes on +your own computers, you have to configure it by yourself. There is no one and +single way on how to configure CGI, as there are many web servers with different +configuration options. The currently most widely used free web server is +`Apache HTTPd `_, Apache for short -- this is the one +that most people use, it can be easily installed on nearly every system using +the systems' package management. But `lighttpd `_ has +been gaining attention since some time and is said to have a better performance. +On many systems this server can also be installed using the package management, +so manually compiling the web server is never needed. + +* On Apache you can take a look into the `Dynamic Content with CGI + `_ tutorial, where everything + is described. Most of the time it is enough just to set ``+ExecCGI``. The + tutorial also describes the most common gotchas that might arise. +* On lighttpd you need to use the `CGI module + `_ which can be configured + in a straightforward way. It boils down to setting ``cgi.assign`` properly. + + +Common problems with CGI scripts +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Trying to use CGI sometimes leads to small annoyances that one might experience +while trying to get these scripts to run. Sometimes it happens that a seemingly +correct script does not work as expected, which is caused by some small hidden +reason that's difficult to spot. + +Some of these reasons are: + +* The Python script is not marked executable. When CGI scripts are not + executable most of the web servers will let the user download it, instead of + running it and sending the output to the user. For CGI scripts to run + properly the ``+x`` bit needs to be set. Using ``chmod a+x your_script.py`` + might already solve the problem. +* The line endings must be of Unix-type. This is important because the web + server checks the first line of the script (called shebang) and tries to run + the program specified there. It gets easily confused by Windows line endings + (Carriage Return & Line Feed, also called CRLF), so you have to convert the + file to Unix line endings (only Line Feed, LF). This can be done + automatically by uploading the file via FTP in text mode instead of binary + mode, but the preferred way is just telling your editor to save the files with + Unix line endings. Most proper editors support this. +* Your web server must be able to read the file, you need to make sure the + permissions are fine. Often the server runs as user and group ``www-data``, + so it might be worth a try to change the file ownership or making the file + world readable by using ``chmod a+r your_script.py``. +* The webserver must be able to know that the file you're trying to access is a + CGI script. Check the configuration of your web server, maybe there is some + mistake. +* The path to the interpreter in the shebang (``#!/usr/bin/env python``) must be + currect. This line calls ``/usr/bin/env`` to find Python, but it'll fail if + there is no ``/usr/bin/env``. If you know where your Python is installed, you + can also use that path. The commands ``whereis python`` and ``type -p + python`` might also help to find where it is installed. Once this is known, + the shebang line can be changed accordingly: ``#!/usr/bin/python``. +* The file must not contain a BOM (Byte Order Mark). The BOM is meant for + determining the byte order of UTF-16 encodings, but some editors write this + also into UTF-8 files. The BOM interferes with the shebang line, so be sure + to tell your editor not to write the BOM. +* :ref:`mod-python` might be making problems. mod_python is able to handle CGI + scripts by itself, but it can also be a source for problems. Be sure you + disable it. + + +.. _mod-python: + +mod_python +---------- + +People coming from PHP often find it hard to grasp how to use Python in the web. +Their first thought is mostly `mod_python `_ because +they think that this is the equivalent to ``mod_php``. Actually it is not +really. It does embed the interpreter into the Apache process, thus speeding up +requests by not having to start a Python interpreter every request. On the +other hand, it is by far not "Python intermixed with HTML" as PHP often does. +The Python equivalent of that is a template engine. mod_python itself is much +more powerful and gives more access to Apache internals. It can emulate CGI, it +can work an a "Python Server Pages" mode similar to JSP which is "HTML +intermangled with Python" and it has a "Publisher" which destignates one file to +accept all requests and decide on what to do then. + +But mod_python has some problems. Unlike the PHP interpreter the Python +interpreter uses caching when executing files, so when changing a file the whole +web server needs to be re-started to update. Another problem ist the basic +concept -- Apache starts some child processes to handle the requests and +unfortunately every child process needs to load the whole Python interpreter +even if it does not use it. This makes the whole web server slower. Another +problem is that as mod_python is linked against a specific version of +``libpython``, it is not possible to switch from an older version to a newer +(e.g. 2.4 to 2.5) without recompiling mod_python. mod_python is also bound to +the Apache web server, so programs written for mod_python cannot easily run on +other web servers. + +These are the reasons why mod_python should be avoided when writing new +programs. In some circumstances it might be still a good idea to use mod_python +for deployment, but WSGI makes it possible to run WSGI programs under mod_python +as well. + + +FastCGI and SCGI +---------------- + +FastCGI and SCGI try to solve the performance problem of CGI in another way. +Instead of embedding the interpreter into the web server, they create +long-running processes which run in the background. There still is some module +in the web server which makes it possible for the web server to "speak" with the +background process. As the background process is independent from the server, +it can be written in any language of course also in Python. The language just +needs to have a library which handles the communication with the web server. + +The difference between FastCGI and SCGI is very small, as SCGI is essentially +just a "simpler FastCGI". But as the web server support for SCGI is limited +most people use FastCGI instead, which works the same way. Almost everything +that applies to SCGI also applies to FastCGI as well, so we'll only write about +the latter. + +These days, FastCGI is never used directly. Just like ``mod_python`` it is only +used for the deployment of WSGI applications. + +.. seealso:: + + * `FastCGI, SCGI, and Apache: Background and Future + `_ + is a discussion on why the concept of FastCGI and SCGI is better that that + of mod_python. + + +Setting up FastCGI +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +Depending on the web server you need to have a special module. + +* Apache has both `mod_fastcgi `_ and `mod_fcgid + `_. ``mod_fastcgi`` is the original one, but it + has some licensing issues that's why it is sometimes considered non-free. + ``mod_fcgid`` is a smaller, compatible alternative. One of these modules needs + to be loaded by Apache. +* lighttpd ships its own `FastCGI module + `_ as well as an `SCGI + module `_. +* nginx also supports `FastCGI + `_. + +Once you have installed and configured the module, you can test it with the +following WSGI-application:: + + #!/usr/bin/env python + # -*- coding: UTF-8 -*- + + from cgi import escape + import sys, os + from flup.server.fcgi import WSGIServer + + def app(environ, start_response): + start_response('200 OK', [('Content-Type', 'text/html')]) + + yield '

FastCGI Environment

' + yield '' + for k, v in sorted(environ.items()): + yield '' % (escape(k), escape(v)) + yield '
%s%s
' + + WSGIServer(app).run() + +This is a simple WSGI application, but you need to install `flup +`_ first, as flup handles the low level +FastCGI access. + +.. seealso:: + + There is some documentation on `setting up Django with FastCGI + `_, most of which can be + reused for other WSGI-compliant frameworks and libraries. Only the + ``manage.py`` part has to be changed, the example used here can be used + instead. Django does more or less the exact same thing. + + +mod_wsgi +-------- + +`mod_wsgi `_ is an attempt to get rid of the low level +gateways. As FastCGI, SCGI, mod_python are mostly used to deploy WSGI +applications anyway, mod_wsgi was started to directly embed WSGI aplications +into the Apache web server. The benefit from this approach is that WSGI +applications can be deployed much easier as is is specially designed to host +WSGI applications -- unlike the other low level methods which have glue code to +host WSGI applications (like flup which was mentioned before). The downside is +that mod_wsgi is limited to the Apache web server, other servers would need +their own implementations of mod_wsgi. + +It supports two modes: the embedded mode in which it integrates with the Apache +process and the daemon mode which is more FastCGI-like. Contrary to FastCGI, +mod_wsgi handles the worker-processes by itself which makes administration +easier. + + +.. _WSGI: + +Step back: WSGI +=============== + +WSGI was already mentioned several times so it has to be something important. +In fact it really is, so now it's time to explain. + +The *Web Server Gateway Interface*, :pep:`333` or WSGI for short is currently +the best possible way to Python web programming. While it is great for +programmers writing frameworks, the normal person does not need to get in direct +contact with it. But when choosing a framework for web development it is a good +idea to take one which supports WSGI. + +The big profit from WSGI is the unification. When your program is compatible +with WSGI -- that means that your framework has support for WSGI, your program +can be deployed on every web server interface for which there are WSGI wrappers. +So you do not need to care about whether the user uses mod_python or FastCGI -- +with WSGI it just works on any gateway interface. The Python standard library +contains its own WSGI server :mod:`wsgiref`, which is a small web server that +can be used for testing. + +A really great WSGI feature are the middlewares. Middlewares are layers around +your program which can add various functionality to it. There is a `number of +middlewares `_ already available. +For example, instead of writing your own session management (to identify a user +in subsequent requests, as HTTP does not maintain state, so it does now know +that the requests belong to the same user) you can just take one middleware, +plug it in and you can rely an already existing functionality. The same thing +is compression -- say you want to compress your HTML using gzip, to save your +server's bandwidth. So you only need to plug-in a middleware and you're done. +Authentication is also a problem easily solved using a middleware. + +So, generally -- although WSGI may seem complex, the initial phase of learning +can be very rewarding as WSGI does already have solutions to many problems that +might arise while writing web sites. + + +WSGI Servers +------------ + +The code that is used to connect to various low level gateways like CGI or +mod_python is called *WSGI server*. One of these servers is ``flup`` which was +already mentioned and supports FastCGI, SCGI as well as `AJP +`_. Some of these servers +are written in Python as ``flup`` is, but there also exist others which are +written in C and can be used as drop-in replacements. + +There are quite a lot of servers already available, so a Python web application +can be deployed nearly everywhere. This is one big advantage that Python has +compared with other web techniques. + +.. seealso:: + + A good overview of all WSGI-related code can be found in the `WSGI wiki + `_, which contains an extensive list of `WSGI servers + `_, which can be used by *every* application + supporting WSGI. + + You might be interested in some WSGI-supporting modules already contained in + the standard library, namely: + + * :mod:`wsgiref` -- some tiny utilities and servers for WSGI + + +Case study: MoinMoin +-------------------- + +What does WSGI give the web application developer? Let's take a look on one +long existing web application written in Python without using WSGI. + +One of the most widely used wiki software is `MoinMoin `_. +It was created in 2000, so it predates WSGI by about three years. While it now +includes support for WSGI, older versions needed separate code to run on CGI, +mod_python, FastCGI and standalone. Now, this all is possible by using WSGI and +the already-written gateways. For running with on FastCGI ``flup`` can be used, +for running a standalone server :mod:`wsgiref` is the way to go. + + +Model-view-controller +===================== + +The term *MVC* is often heard in statements like "framework *foo* supports MVC". +While MVC is not really something technical but rather organisational, many web +frameworks use this model to help the developer to bring structure into his +program. Bigger web applications can have lots of code so it is a good idea to +have structure in the program right from the beginnings. That way, even users +of other frameworks (or even languages, as MVC is nothing Python-specific) can +understand the existing code easier, as they are already familiar with the +structure. + +MVC stands for three components: + +* The *model*. This is the data that is meant to modify. In Python frameworks + this component is often represented by the classes used by the + object-relational mapper. So, all declarations go here. +* The *view*. This component's job is to display the data of the model to the + user. Typically this component is represented by the templates. +* The *controller*. This is the layer between the user and the model. The + controller reacts on user actions (like opening some specific URL) and tells + the model to modify the data if neccessary. + +While one might think that MVC is a complex design pattern, in fact it is not. +It is used in Python because it has turned out to be useful for creating clean, +maintainable web sites. + +.. note:: + + While not all Python frameworks explicitly support MVC, it is often trivial + to create a web site which uses the MVC pattern by seperating the data logic + (the model) from the user interaction logic (the controller) and the + templates (the view). That's why it is important not to write unneccessary + Python code in the templates -- it is against MVC and creates more chaos. + +.. seealso:: + + The english Wikipedia has an article about the `Model-View-Controller pattern + `_, which includes a long + list of web frameworks for different programming languages. + + +Ingredients for web sites +========================= + +Web sites are complex constructs, so tools were created to help the web site +developer to make his work maintainable. None of these tools are in any way +Python specific, they also exist for other programming languages as well. Of +course, developers are not forced to use these tools and often there is no +"best" tool, but it is worth informing yourself before choosing something +because of the big number of helpers that the developer can use. + + +.. seealso:: + + People have written far more components that can be combined than these + presented here. The Python wiki has a page about these components, called + `Web Components `_. + + +Templates +--------- + +Mixing of HTML and Python code is possible with some libraries. While +convenient at first, it leads to horribly unmaintainable code. That's why +templates exist. Templates are, in the simplest case, just HTML files with +placeholders. The HTML is sent to the user's browser after filling out the +placeholders. + +Python already includes such simple templates:: + + # a simple template + template = "

Hello %s!

" + print template % "Reader" + +The Python standard library also includes some more advanced templates usable +through :class:`string.Template`, but in HTML templates it is needed to use +conditional and looping contructs like Python's *for* and *if*. So, some +*template engine* is needed. + +Now, Python has a lot of template engines which can be used with or without a +`framework`_. Some of these are using a plain-text programming language which +is very easy to learn as it is quite limited while others use XML so the +template output is always guaranteed to be valid XML. Some `frameworks`_ ship +their own template engine or recommend one particular. If one is not yet sure, +using these is a good idea. + +.. note:: + + While Python has quite a lot of different template engines it usually does + not make sense to use a homebrewed template system. The time needed to + evaluate all templating systems is not really worth it, better invest the + time in looking through the most popular ones. Some frameworks have their + own template engine or have a recommentation for one. It's wise to use + these. + + Popular template engines include: + + * Mako + * Genshi + * Jinja + +.. seealso:: + + Lots of different template engines divide the attention between themselves + because it's easy to create them in Python. The page `Templating + `_ in the wiki lists a big, + ever-growing number of these. + + +Data persistence +---------------- + +*Data persistence*, while sounding very complicated is just about storing data. +This data might be the text of blog entries, the postings of a bulletin board or +the text of a wiki page. As always, there are different ways to store +informations on a web server. + +Often relational database engines like `MySQL `_ or +`PostgreSQL `_ are used due to their good +performance handling very large databases consisting of up to millions of +entries. These are *queried* using a language called `SQL +`_. Python programmers in general do not like +SQL too much, they prefer to work with objects. It is possible to save Python +objects into a database using a technology called `ORM +`_. ORM translates all +object-oriented access into SQL code under the hood, the user does not need to +think about it. Most `frameworks`_ use ORMs and it works quite well. + +A second possibility is using files that are saved on the hard disk (sometimes +called flatfiles). This is very easy, but is not too fast. There is even a +small database engine called `SQLite `_ which is bundled +with Python in the :mod:`sqlite` module and uses only one file. This database +can be used to store objects via an ORM and has no other dependencies. For +smaller sites SQLite is just enough. But it is not the only way in which data +can be saved into the file systems. Sometimes normal, plain text files are +enough. + +The third and least used possibility are so-called object oriented databases. +These databases store the *actual objects* instead of the relations that +OR-mapping creates between rows in a database. This has the advantage that +nearly all objects can be saven in a straightforward way, unlike in relational +databases where some objects are very hard to represent with ORMs. + +`Frameworks`_ often give the users hints on which method to choose, it is +usually a good idea to stick to these unless there are some special requirements +which require to use the one method and not the other. + +.. seealso:: + + * `Persistence Tools `_ lists + possibilities on how to save data in the file system, some of these modules + are part of the standard library + * `Database Programming `_ + helps on choosing a method on how to save the data + * `SQLAlchemy `_, the most powerful OR-Mapper for + Python and `Elixir `_ which makes it easier to + use + * `SQLObject `_, another popular OR-Mapper + * `ZODB `_ and `Durus + `_, two object oriented + databases + + +.. _framework: + +Frameworks +========== + +As web sites can easily become quite large, there are so-called frameworks which +were created to help the developer with making these sites. Although the most +well-known framework is Ruby on Rails, Python does also have its own frameworks +which are partly inspired by Rails or which were existing a long time before +Rails. + +Two possible approaches to web frameworks exist: the minimalistic approach and +the all-inclusive approach (somtimes called *full-stack*). Frameworks which are +all-inclusive give you everything you need to start working, like a template +engine, some way to save and access data in databases and many features more. +Most users are best off using these as they are widely used by lots of other +users and well documented in form of books and tutorials. Other web frameworks +go the minimalistic approach trying to be as flexible as possible leaving the +user the freedom to choose what's best for him. + +The majority of users is best off with all-inclusive framewors. They bring +everything along so a user can just jump in and start to code. While they do +have some limitations they can fullfill 80% of what one will ever want to +perfectly. They consist of various components which are designed to work +together as good as possible. + +The multitude of web frameworks written in Python demonstrates that it is really +easy to write one. One of the most well-known web applications written in +Python is `Zope `_ which can be regarded as some kind of +big framework. But Zope was not the only framework, there were some others +which are by now nearly forgotten. These do not need to be mentioned anymore, +because most people that used them moved on to newer ones. + + +Some notable frameworks +----------------------- + +There is an incredible number of frameworks, so there is no way to describe them +all. It is not even neccessary, as most of these frameworks are nothing special +and everything that can be done with these can also be done with one of the +popular ones. + + +Django +^^^^^^ + +`Django `_ is a framework consisting of several +tightly coupled elements which were written from scratch and work together very +well. It includes an ORM which is quite powerful while being simple to use and +has a great online administration interface which makes it possible to edit the +data in the database with a browser. The template engine is text-based and is +designed to be usable for page designers who cannot write Python. It supports +so-called template inheritance and filters (which work like Unix pipes). Django +has many handy features bundled, like creation of RSS feeds or generic views +which make it possible to write web sites nearly without any Python code. + +It has a big, international community which has created many sites using Django. +There are also quite a lot of add-on projects which extend Django's normal +functionality. This is partly due to Django's well written `online +documentation `_ and the `Django book +`_. + + +.. note:: + + Although Django is an MVC-style framework, it calls the components + differently, which is described in the `Django FAQ + `_. + + +TurboGears +^^^^^^^^^^ + +The other popular web framework in Python is `TurboGears +`_. It takes the approach of using already existing +components and combining them with glue code to create a seamless experience. +TurboGears gives the user more flexibility on which components to choose, the +ORM can be switched between some easy to use but limited and complex but very +powerful. Same goes for the template engine. One strong point about TurboGears +is that the components that it consists of can be used easily in other projects +without depending on TurboGears, for example the underlying web server CherryPy. + +The documentation can be found in the `TurboGears wiki +`_, where links to screencasts can be found. +TurboGears has also an active user community which can respond to most related +questions. There is also a `TurboGears book `_ +published, which is a good starting point. + +The plan for the next major version of TurboGears, version 2.0 is to switch to a +more flexible base provided by another very flexible web framework called +`Pylons `_. + + +Other notable frameworks +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +These two are of course not the only frameworks that are available, there are +also some less-popular frameworks worth mentioning. + +One of these is the already mentioned Zope, which has been around for quite a +long time. With Zope 2.x having been known as rather un-pythonic, the newer +Zope 3.x tries to change that and therefore gets more acceptance from Python +programmers. These efforts already showed results, there is a project which +connects Zope with WSGI called `Repoze `_ and another +project called `Grok `_ which makes it possible for +"normal" Python programmers use the very mature Zope components. + +Another framework that's already been mentioned is `Pylons`_. Pylons is much +like TurboGears with ab even stronger emphasis on flexibility, which is bought +at the cost of being more difficult to use. Nearly every component can be +exchanged, which makes it neccessary to use the documentation of every single +component, because there are so many Pylons combinations possible that can +satisfy every requirement. Pylons builds upon `Paste +`_, an extensive set of tools which are handy for WSGI. + +And that's still not everything. The most up-to-date information can always be +found in the Python wiki. + +.. seealso:: + + The Python wiki contains an extensive list of `web frameworks + `_. + + Most frameworks also have their own mailing lists and IRC channels, look out + for these on the projects' websites. There is also a general "Python in the + Web" IRC channel on freenode called `#python.web + `_.