--- a/kerneltest/e32test/system/t_atomicu.cpp	Tue Aug 31 16:34:26 2010 +0300
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,205 +0,0 @@
-// Copyright (c) 2003-2009 Nokia Corporation and/or its subsidiary(-ies).
-// All rights reserved.
-// This component and the accompanying materials are made available
-// under the terms of the License "Eclipse Public License v1.0"
-// which accompanies this distribution, and is available
-// at the URL "http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html".
-//
-// Initial Contributors:
-// Nokia Corporation - initial contribution.
-//
-// Contributors:
-//
-// Description:
-// e32test\system\t_atomicu.cpp
-// Overview:
-// Simple test for class User atomic operations
-// API Information:
-// User::SafeInc(), User::SafeDec(), User::LockedInc(),
-// User::LockedDec()
-// Details:
-// - Tests SafeInc, SafeDec, LockedInc and LockedDec
-// functions in single thread and determines that counts
-// match after finished
-// - Tests SafeInc, SafeDec, LockedInc and LockedDec
-// functions in multithreaded configuration and determines
-// that counts match after finished
-// Platforms/Drives/Compatibility:
-// All.
-// Assumptions/Requirement/Pre-requisites:
-// Failures and causes:
-// Base Port information:
-// 
-//
-
-#define __E32TEST_EXTENSION__
-#include <e32test.h>
-#include <e32svr.h>
-#include <e32def.h>
-
-LOCAL_D RTest test(_L("T_ATOMICU"));
-
-const TInt KMaxOps=20000;
-#define KNumThreads 20
-TInt gValue=0;
-
-void TestSafeIncAndSafeDec()
-	{
-	gValue=0;
-	// increasing when 0, should return 0
-	test(User::SafeInc(gValue)==0);
-	// value also should be 0
-	test(gValue==0);
-	
-	gValue=1;
-	TInt expected=0;
-	// gValue should vary only between 1 and 2
-	for (TInt i=0; i<KMaxOps; i++)
-		{
-		expected=User::SafeInc(gValue)+1;
-		test(expected==User::SafeDec(gValue));
-		}
-
-	// after running these, it should be 1
-	test(gValue==1);
-	
-	// should stay zero after decreasing from 1 multiple times
-	test(User::SafeDec(gValue)==1);
-	test(User::SafeDec(gValue)==0);
-	test(User::SafeDec(gValue)==0);
-	test(gValue==0);
-	}
-
-void TestLockedIncAndLockedDec()
-	{
-	gValue=0;
-	// increasing when 0, should return 0 as old value
-	test(User::LockedInc(gValue)==0);
-	// new value should be 1
-	test(gValue==1);
-
-	gValue=-1;
-
-	// gValue should vary only between 1 and 2
-	for (TInt i=0; i<KMaxOps; i++)
-		{
-		test((User::LockedInc(gValue)+1)==User::LockedDec(gValue));
-		}
-
-	// after running these, it should be back in -1
-	test(gValue==-1);
-	}
-
-TInt MultiThreadSafeIncAndSafeDec_FUNC(TAny*)
-	{
-	for (TInt i=0; i<KMaxOps; i++)
-		{
-		User::SafeInc(gValue);
-		User::SafeDec(gValue);
-		}
-	return KErrNone;
-	}
-
-TInt MultiThreadLockedIncAndLockedDec_FUNC(TAny*)
-	{
-	for (TInt i=0; i<KMaxOps; i++)
-		{
-		User::LockedInc(gValue);
-		User::LockedDec(gValue);
-		}
-	return KErrNone;
-	}
-
-void MultiThreadSafeIncAndSafeDec()
-	{
-	gValue=1; // start value 1
-	RThread threads[KNumThreads];
-	TRequestStatus stats[KNumThreads];
-	TInt i;
-
-	for (i=0;i<KNumThreads;i++)
-		{
-		test_KErrNone(threads[i].Create(KNullDesC,MultiThreadSafeIncAndSafeDec_FUNC,KDefaultStackSize,NULL,NULL));
-		threads[i].Logon(stats[i]);
-		}
-	
-	//lets increase our priority first, so that all the threads start
-	RThread().SetPriority(EPriorityMore);
-
-	test.Printf(_L("Resuming threads...\n"));
-	for(i=0; i<KNumThreads; i++)
-		threads[i].Resume();
-
-	for(i=0; i<KNumThreads; i++)
-		{
-		User::WaitForRequest(stats[i]);
-		test_KErrNone(stats[i].Int());
-		CLOSE_AND_WAIT(threads[i]);
-		}
-
-	test.Printf(_L("...Threads finished\n"));
-	
-	// back to normal
-	RThread().SetPriority(EPriorityNormal);
-
-	// test that we returned to the startvalue
-	test(gValue==1);
-	}
-
-void MultiThreadLockedIncAndLockedDec()
-	{
-	gValue=-1; // set start value to -1
-	RThread threads[KNumThreads];
-	TRequestStatus stats[KNumThreads];
-	TInt i;
-
-	for (i=0;i<KNumThreads;i++)
-		{
-		test_KErrNone(threads[i].Create(KNullDesC,MultiThreadLockedIncAndLockedDec_FUNC,KDefaultStackSize,NULL,NULL));
-		threads[i].Logon(stats[i]);
-		}
-	
-	//lets increase our priority first, so that all the threads start
-	RThread().SetPriority(EPriorityMore);
-
-	test.Printf(_L("Resuming threads...\n"));
-	for(i=0; i<KNumThreads; i++)
-		threads[i].Resume();
-
-	for(i=0; i<KNumThreads; i++)
-		{
-		User::WaitForRequest(stats[i]);
-		test_KErrNone(stats[i].Int());
-		CLOSE_AND_WAIT(threads[i]);
-		}
-
-	test.Printf(_L("...Threads finished\n"));
-	
-	// back to normal
-	RThread().SetPriority(EPriorityNormal);
-
-	// test that we returned to the startvalue
-	test(gValue==-1);
-	}
-
-
-TInt E32Main()
-	{
-	test.Title();
-	
-	test.Start(_L("Test single thread User::SafeInc and User::SafeDec"));
-	TestSafeIncAndSafeDec();
-	
-	test.Next(_L("Test single thread User::LockedInc and User::LockedDec"));
-	TestLockedIncAndLockedDec();
-
-	test.Next(_L("Test multiple thread User::SafeInc and User::SafeDec"));
-	MultiThreadSafeIncAndSafeDec();
-	
-	test.Next(_L("Test multiple thread User::LockedInc and User::LockedDec"));
-	MultiThreadLockedIncAndLockedDec();
-
-	test.End();
-
-	return KErrNone;
-	}