/*

* Copyright (c) 2003-2009 Nokia Corporation and/or its subsidiary(-ies).

* All rights reserved.

* This component and the accompanying materials are made available

* under the terms of "Eclipse Public License v1.0"

* which accompanies this distribution, and is available

* at the URL "http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html".

*

* Initial Contributors:

* Nokia Corporation - initial contribution.

*

* Contributors:

*

* Description: 

*

*/

#include <e32test.h>

#include <f32file.h>

#include "t_utils.h"

_LIT(KTestName,"T_CntMatch");

#include "testhelpers.h"

RFs fs;

_LIT(KDatabaseFileName,"c:T_CntMatch");

#if defined(__EABI__)

 _LIT(KTestFileName, "z:\\CntmodelTest\\%S");

#else

 _LIT(KTestFileName, "z:\\system\\programs\\cntmodelTest\\%S");

#endif

_LIT(KCntName,"Firstname");

_LIT(KCntSurname,"Surname");

GLDEF_D CCntTest* CntTest=NULL;

TInt PhoneNumberFieldIndex = -1;

TBool FileExists(const TDesC& aFilename)

	{

	TUint val;

	TBool res = fs.Att(aFilename, val) == KErrNone;

	return res;

	}

// Delete the current contacts database and create a new one

//

LOCAL_C void ResetDatabaseL()

	{

	CntTest->CloseDatabase();

	CntTest->DeleteDatabaseL();

	CntTest->CreateDatabaseL();

	CntTest->OpenDatabaseL();

	// Reset all server side speed dials ;-)))

	CntTest->Db()->ResetServerSpeedDialsL();

	}

LOCAL_C TContactItemId CreateContactL(const TDesC& aFirstName, const TDesC& aFamilyName, const TDesC& aPhoneNo, const TDesC& aMobileNo)

	{

	CContactItem* item=CContactCard::NewLC();

	SetNameL(*item,KUidContactFieldGivenName,KUidContactFieldVCardMapUnusedN,aFirstName,ETrue);

	SetNameL(*item,KUidContactFieldFamilyName,KUidContactFieldVCardMapUnusedN,aFamilyName,ETrue);

	SetNameL(*item,KUidContactFieldPhoneNumber,KUidContactFieldVCardMapTEL,aPhoneNo,ETrue); //KUidContactFieldVCardMapTELFAX

	if (aMobileNo.Length() > 0)

		SetNameL(*item,KUidContactFieldPhoneNumber,KUidContactFieldVCardMapCELL,aMobileNo,ETrue);

	item->SetTemplateRefId(KGoldenTemplateId);

	TContactItemId id=CntTest->Db()->AddNewContactL(*item);

	CleanupStack::PopAndDestroy(item);

	return id;

	}

LOCAL_C TInt CheckPhoneMatchL(const TDesC& aPhoneNumberToMatch, TInt aNumberOfMatchDigits) //, TInt aExpectedNumOfMatches)

	{

	TBuf<256> testCase;

	_LIT(KFormat,"Checking matches to %S, matching %d digits");

	testCase.Format(KFormat, &aPhoneNumberToMatch, aNumberOfMatchDigits);

	//test.Next(_L(" "));

	CContactDatabase& db = *(CntTest->Db());

	CContactIdArray* array = db.MatchPhoneNumberL(aPhoneNumberToMatch,aNumberOfMatchDigits);

	CleanupStack::PushL(array);

	const TInt numberOfMatches = array->Count();

	CleanupStack::PopAndDestroy(array);

	return numberOfMatches;

	}

//Simple test cases

LOCAL_C void PerfectMatchL()

	{

	//Database contains the only phone number.

	//We search for exactly the same number.

	//The matching must return one for all the rage of digits.

	ResetDatabaseL();

	_LIT(KTestNumber2,"4362 5120 7000 0001");

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,KTestNumber2,KNullDesC);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,1) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,2) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,3) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,4) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,5) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,6) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,7) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,8) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,9) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,10) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,11) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,12) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,13) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,14) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,15) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber2,16) == 0);	// AB - only 15 digits..

	//Here it works...

	//The same story - match on itself must happen for all the rage of digits.

	_LIT(KTestNumber,"789543625 120 7582 2381");

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,KTestNumber,KNullDesC);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,1) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,2) == 0);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,3) == 0);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,4) == 0);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,5) == 0);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,6) == 0);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,7) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,8) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,9) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,10) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,11) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,12) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,13) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,14) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,15) == 1);

	TESTTRUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,16) == 0);	// AB - not 16 digits, 15 is max.

	//Here it doesn't

	/*  At the moment, the function simply returns "no matches" if the

		number of match digits is incorrect. At no point does it leave with

		KErrArgument; if it did, it is possible that client code could be

		broken because it expects the API to return zero, not that it should

		leave. Whilst leaving with KErrArgument is a laudable aspiration, it

		should not be changed here without going through the appropriate

		assessment process. Suggest raising a CR.

	//We shouldn't be able to match on less than 1 digit...

	TRAPD(err,CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,0));

	TESTVALUE(err, KErrArgument);

	TRAP(err,CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,-15));

	TESTVALUE(err, KErrArgument);

	//We do not provide matching for more than 16 digits.

	TRAP(err, CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber,200));

	TESTVALUE(err, KErrArgument);

	*/

	}

LOCAL_C void DontUnderestimateTheMeaningOfZeroL()

	{

	ResetDatabaseL();

	//Database contains only this number 228 876 5324;

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("228 876 5324"),KNullDesC);

	//Trying to search on that exact number by 6 digits...

		TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(		_L("228 876 5324"), 6),0);

	//No matches, well I kind of expected it... :-(

	//Now we add a number that differs from the first one by one digit..

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("228 076 5324"),KNullDesC);

	//Repeat our search

		TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(		_L("228 876 5324"), 6),1);

	//It matches!!... Please don't laugh! There is logic in it!

	//If the number doesn't match to itself - then it should match on different one! ;-)

	}

LOCAL_C void Test2L()

	{

	ResetDatabaseL();

	//if 5324 doesn't match to  228 100 5324...

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("228 100 5324"),KNullDesC);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(					_L("5324"),11),0);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(					_L("5324"), 4),0);

	//it shouldn't match to 228 000 5324 as well, but... it does

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("228 000 5324"),KNullDesC);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(					_L("5324"),11),1);	// AB

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(					_L("5324"), 4),1);

	}

LOCAL_C void TestCallingAmericaL()

	{

	ResetDatabaseL();

	//here are some additional test numbers for testing the acceptance of the '(+' combination

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("(+358) 1234567"),KNullDesC);

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("(358) 1234567"),KNullDesC);

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("+358 1234567"),KNullDesC);

	//when searching for any of the above numbers 3 instances should be found

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+358) 1234567"),10),3);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(358) 1234567"),10),3);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("+358 1234567"),10),3);

	// Note that the phone number parser does generate a hash of 0 for all

	//these now that the '(+'combination is recognised

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"),KNullDesC);

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("(+1) 0789 37737 39173-1"),KNullDesC);

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("(+1) 0755 789 445 557"),KNullDesC);

	//these numbers should no longer be found

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(650)365-0000"),4),0);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("20 00000 00000"),11),0);

	//the american number should now be found with out a problem

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"), 7),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"), 8),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"), 9),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"),10),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"),11),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"),12),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"),13),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"),14),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"),15),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("(+1) 0755 345 3644 644"),16),1);

	}

LOCAL_C void Test3L()

	{

	ResetDatabaseL();

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L(		   "123 4567"),KNullDesC);

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("9876543 123 4567"),KNullDesC);

	//it definetly should match on itself....

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("123 4567"), 7),2); //Both numbers match by 7 digits..

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("123 4567"), 8),2); //But they must differ for more digits

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("123 4567"), 9),2); // AB - all these should match both...

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("123 4567"),10),2);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("123 4567"),11),2);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("123 4567"),12),2);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("123 4567"),13),2);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("123 4567"),14),2);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("123 4567"),15),2);

	}

LOCAL_C void Test4L()

	{

	ResetDatabaseL();

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L(	  "6543 123 4567 00"),KNullDesC);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("6543 123 456700"), 7),1); //Both numbers match by 7 digits..

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("6543 123 456700"), 8),1); //But they must differ for more digits

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("6543 123 456700"), 9),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("6543 123 456700"),10),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("6543 123 456700"),11),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("6543 123 456700"),12),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("6543 123 456700"),13),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("6543 123 456700"),14),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("6543 123 456700"),15),1);

	}

LOCAL_C void Test5L()

	{

	ResetDatabaseL();

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,_L("01234 56789"),KNullDesC);

	//it definetly should match on itself....

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("00 44 1234 56789"), 7),1); //Both numbers match by 7 digits..

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("00 44 1234 56789"), 8),1); //But they must differ for more digits

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("00 44 1234 56789"), 9),1);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("00 44 1234 56789"),10),0);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("00 44 1234 56789"),11),0);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("00 44 1234 56789"),12),0);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("00 44 1234 56789"),13),0);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("00 44 1234 56789"),14),0);

	TESTVALUE(CheckPhoneMatchL(_L("00 44 1234 56789"),15),0);

	}

/**

+@SYMTestType UT

+@SYMTestPriority Critical

+@SYMDEF PDEF097460

+@SYMTestCaseDesc Tests that attempting to match a phone number consisting of

+only "(" does not cause a panic.

+@SYMTestActions

+1. Add a number consisting only of "(".

+2. Check that no panic or error occurs when we attempt to match.

+@SYMTestExpectedResults No panic occurs.

+*/

void TestPDEF097460()

	{

	test.Next(_L("Testing fix for PDEF097460."));

	//

	// 1. Add a number consisting only of "(".

	//

	_LIT(KTestNumber3,"(");

	CreateContactL(KCntName,KCntSurname,KTestNumber3,KNullDesC);

	//

	// 2. Check that no panic or error occurs when we attempt to match.

	//

	TRAPD( err, CheckPhoneMatchL(KTestNumber3,1) );

	test( err == KErrNone );

	}

/////// CCsvReader  class //////////////////////////

class CCsvReader : CBase

	{

public:

	static CCsvReader* NewLC(const TDesC& filename);

	~CCsvReader();

	CDesCArray* ReadNextLineL();

private:

	CCsvReader() {};

	RFs iFs;

	RFile iSrcFile;

	};

CCsvReader::~CCsvReader()

	{

	iSrcFile.Close();

	}

CCsvReader* CCsvReader::NewLC(const TDesC& filename)

	{

	CCsvReader* self = new (ELeave) CCsvReader();

	CleanupStack::PushL(self);

	User::LeaveIfError(self->iFs.Connect());

	User::LeaveIfError(self->iSrcFile.Open(self->iFs,filename,EFileRead));

	return self;

	}

CDesCArray* CCsvReader::ReadNextLineL()

	{

	TBool goOn = ETrue;

	TBuf8<1> symbol;

	TFileName buf;

	CDesCArraySeg* array = new (ELeave) CDesCArraySeg(3);

	CleanupStack::PushL(array);

	while (goOn)

		{

		User::LeaveIfError(iSrcFile.Read(symbol, 1));

		if(symbol.Length() == 0)

			{

			if (buf.Length() > 0) //If there is something in the buffer - save in array

				array->AppendL(buf);

			if (array->Count() > 0)

				{

				CleanupStack::Pop(array);

				return array; //If array is not empty - return what we've got

				}

			else

				{

				CleanupStack::PopAndDestroy(array);

				return NULL;  //If array is empty - return zero to indicate EOF

				}

			}

		TChar chr = symbol[0];

		switch(chr)

			{

			case '\r': 	goOn = EFalse;

			case ';': 	array->AppendL(buf);

						buf.Zero();

			case '\n':  //Ignore

			break;

			default:

				buf.Append(chr);

			}

		}

	CleanupStack::Pop(array);

	return array;

	}

LOCAL_C void FillInDatabaseL(const TDesC& file)

	{

	test.Printf(_L("Creating Database:\n"));

	CntTest->CreateDatabaseL();

	CCsvReader* reader = CCsvReader::NewLC(file);

	FOREVER

		{

		CDesCArray* arr = reader->ReadNextLineL();

		if (!arr) //EOF reached

			break;

		PUSH(arr);

		const TPtrC surname	= (*arr)[0];

		const TPtrC name	= (*arr)[1];

		const TPtrC phone	= (*arr)[2];

		CreateContactL(name, surname, phone, KNullDesC);

		test.Printf(surname.Mid(0,1));

		POPD(arr);

		}

	POPD(reader);

	CntTest->Db()->CompactL();

	}

void SetPhoneNumberFieldIndex(const TContactItemId& id)

	{

	CContactItem* cnt = CntTest->Db()->ReadContactL(id);

	PUSH(cnt);

	TInt fldInd = 0;

	FOREVER  //Find a field with phone number

		{

		fldInd = cnt->CardFields().FindNext(KUidContactFieldPhoneNumber,KUidContactFieldVCardMapTEL, fldInd+1);

		ASSERT(fldInd != KErrNotFound);

		CContactItemField& phoneFld = cnt->CardFields().operator[](fldInd); //fldInd

		const TPtrC& phoneNum = phoneFld.TextStorage()->Text();

		if (phoneNum.Length())

			{

			PhoneNumberFieldIndex = fldInd;

			break;

			}

		}

	POPD(cnt);

	}

LOCAL_C CDesCArraySeg* MatchL(const TDesC& phone, TInt matchOn)

	{

	CDesCArraySeg* retArray = new (ELeave) CDesCArraySeg(3);

	PUSH(retArray);

	CContactIdArray* array = CntTest->Db()->MatchPhoneNumberL(phone,matchOn);

	CleanupStack::PushL(array);

	const TInt numberOfMatches = array->Count();

	for(TInt j=0; j<numberOfMatches; ++j)  //Cycle on results of matching

		{

		const TContactItemId& id = (*array)[j];

		if (PhoneNumberFieldIndex == -1) //Find an index for the field with the phone (depends on template)

			SetPhoneNumberFieldIndex(id);

		CContactItem* cnt = CntTest->Db()->ReadContactL(id);

		CleanupStack::PushL(cnt);

		CContactItemField& phoneFld = cnt->CardFields().operator[](PhoneNumberFieldIndex); //todo: 27-magic number

		const TPtrC& phoneStr = phoneFld.TextStorage()->Text();

		retArray->AppendL(phoneStr);

		CleanupStack::PopAndDestroy(cnt);

		}

	CleanupStack::PopAndDestroy(array);

	POP(retArray);

	return retArray;

	}

TBool FilesAreIdenticaL(const TDesC& file1, const TDesC& file2)

	{

	RFile aFile;

	RFile bFile;

	TBuf8<256> aBuf;

	TBuf8<256> bBuf;

	TBool retVal = ETrue;

	TESTNOERRL(aFile.Open(fs,file1,EFileRead));

	TESTNOERRL(bFile.Open(fs,file2,EFileRead));

	do  {

		TESTNOERRL(aFile.Read(aBuf));

		TESTNOERRL(bFile.Read(bBuf));

		if (aBuf != bBuf)

			{

			retVal =  EFalse;

			break;

			}

		}

	while (aBuf.Length() > 0 || bBuf.Length() >0);

	aFile.Close();

	bFile.Close();

	return retVal;

	}

LOCAL_C void CheckMatchingL(const TDesC& aDatabase, const TDesC& aMatchtable, const TDesC& aResultTable)